UK & World News
Aamir Siddiqi Hitmen Jailed For 40 Years
Two hitmen who stabbed an innocent schoolboy to death by mistake have been jailed for a minimum of 40 years.
Ben Hope, 39, and Jason Richards, 38, both from Cardiff, were each paid £1,000 in "blood money" to murder a middle-aged family man who owed money to a shady businessman.
But the "hit" went wrong when the balaclava-clad killers, who were high on drugs, went to the wrong address in Roath, Cardiff, in April 2010 and murdered teenager Aamir Siddiqi by mistake.
The 17-year-old's frantic parents, Iqbal and Parveen, fought to save their son but were also knifed by the killers, who let out chilling howls.
Both men had protested their innocence throughout the four-and-a-half month trial at Swansea Crown Court and attempted to blame each other.
But a jury unanimously found them guilty of Aamir's murder and the attempted murder of his parents.
In sentencing, Mr Justice Royce said he had no choice but to "significantly increase" the minimum term of 30 years the prosecution had asked for.
"Aamir Siddiqi was the youngest child and only son of Sheikh Iqbal and Parveen Ahmed," he said.
"He was a bright, gentle and courteous boy who was much loved by his family. He had secured a place to study law at Cardiff and his future was brimming with promise.
"He was awaiting the arrival of his Koran teacher when he rushed past his parents to open the door.
"You two came in, wearing balaclavas and making a terrible wailing sound. Your attack on him was brutal, savage, callous and cruel.
"You hacked him to death in front of his parents, who fought in vain to save Aamir.
"It was simply good fortune that they were not killed. It was your intention that they should die too. The aggravating features of this case mean the starting point should significantly increase.
"The starting point is 40 years. If you die in jail, few will shed a tear and many will say it will be more than deserved."
Following the sentencing, Aamir's sister, Nishat Siddiqi, posted on her Twitter page: "Am amazed and humbled by the kindness, love and support shown to my family and me in the aftermath of Aamir's murder. I will never forget."
During their trial, the court heard Hope and Richards had been paid by a businessman, angry over a collapsed property deal, to kill a father-of-four who lived in a neighbouring street.
But they went instead to a similar looking red brick, end-of-row house just around the corner in Ninian Road in the leafy suburb of Roath.
Aamir had run down the stairs to answer the door expecting to see his imam, who was due to give him a Koran lesson. Instead, he opened the front door to two masked killers high on heroin.
Hope and Richards wielded daggers over their heads and howled as they set upon the helpless A-level student.
The teenager desperately tried to run back into the house but they chased him and repeatedly lashed out.
Update:
Hello, regular commenting on Orange News and Sport pages closes on Thursday 30 May 2013. We will continue to provide a commenting facility on major news and sport events on orangeworld.co.uk. Contact us via http://oran.ge/OWfeedback if you have any further questions. Thanks.
what do you think?

Graham Dunn
At last a proper sentence. But just wait for the appeal.

t.bulgin
Agreed, 40 years. It would be even better if they had ten years added after the appeal.

Robert Hare
40 years I suppose is some justice for the victims family. But its 40 years of being kept by the taxpayer Surely capital punishment would of been the cheaper option
Name witheld
This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

El Bubsio
Nope. Several studies in the USA have shown that the death penalty costs considerably more than life imprisonment. In fact, a study by californian officials in 2008 concluded that the state could save a billion dollars in five years if they abolished it. Just Google 'death penalty expensive 'for more details (it was the first result for my search).

Robert Hare
This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

t.bulgin
I agree Robert, proper justice as well. As long as it is carried out within a month of the verdict El, then it would be cheaper. It's all the years of expensive appeals that cost so much money. As usual, the legal profession have made an industry out of it. Sentenced to death. One month later, your gone. Simple.

El Bubsio
And you don't see a problem with that t.b? With 142 death row inmates being acquitted in the USA since the 70s, how many innocent people do you think would be executed in this country under your idea? As I said to Diane, would you take the job of telling grieving families that their innocent son/husband/father has been executed without due process to save a few quid?

field_pete
This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

jimmy jelly1979
if you believe it costs 40 - 45 thousand a year then you need locking up.

field_pete
Come on then Einstein, what's the cost?

Diane Rogers
Whatever it cost to keep people in jail is to much, hang them and be done

field_pete
That's right Diane.Too much time and money is wasted on people who show no respect so why should we allow them to live in a glorified holiday camp for the duration of their sentence.

El Bubsio
And when an innocent person is hanged, you'd take the job of telling their family that 'oh, well, at least we saved a few quid' would you, Diane? What if it was a member of your family or a friend facing this sentence. Would you still want them executed as quickly as possible and forego any chance of appealing their sentence? And before you say 'oh, that would never happen to anyone I know, there have been several cases where innocent people were jailed for murder based on flawed or false evidence'. And what crimes does your hopelessly sweeping statement cover? Are you saying we should hang people for motoring offences or non payment of fines?

Diane Rogers
El Bubsio, did I say execute murderers straight away, NO it would have to be proved without doubt. No one in my family would do anything like this we were bought up to respect others as my 3 children have.

El Bubsio
Errr, yes Diane, that's pretty much what you said - "Hang them and be done". That sounds pretty immediate to me. If you believe that people should be afforded every opportunity to prove their innocence then what you're asking for is the US system, which as I've already pointed out, costs far more for executions than life in prison. So that raises the question, would you be willing to pay the extra from your taxes just to satisfy your desire for revenge? Oh and I see you avoided my questions about family members and innocent people. As I said, innocent people being convicted is not unheard of in this country. So, based on that premise, let's say a member of your family etc was falsely convicted and faced the death penalty. Would you still want it then? And once again, would you take the job of telling innocent people's families that their son/daughter etc has been executed wrongly to save money (which it wouldn't)?

Diane Rogers
I don't earn enough to pay taxes. I would not keep them in jail as long as they do in USA, say 5yrs at most. Then goodbye, as I said we were bought up to respect others as my 3 children have been.

Diane Rogers
Appeals should not take that long if the lawyers did their job. And yes I would tell the family.

Diane Rogers
Can I ask you why you have to resort to insults when others do not agree wirh you

El Bubsio
Whether appeals should or shouldn't take that long is irrelevant. They DO take that long and that's not the prisoners fault. Also, lawyers doing their jobs properly and exploring every avenue is one of the reasons they DO take so long. Now just to get this straight, you'd be fine with going to a grieving parent's house and sitting down with them and telling them their child had been wrongly executed after their right to appeal were ignored or cut short would you? Would you mention it was to save money? Would you tell them that you thought it was the right thing? To think, you call other people monsters and the like. I see you've ignored my question about family members/friends again. After 3 opportunities to answer I can only assume you can't as it would show up the massive flaws in your argument.

El Bubsio
What insults have i used Diane? I've simply pointed out the hypocrisy in your views and obvious flaws in your logic which you cannot address. If you see those as insults then I can only assume you get insulted a lot.

Diane Rogers
Yes I would tell them. I have answered your question MY FAMILY WOULD NOT MURDER ANYONE WE HAVE BEEN BOUGHT UP TO RESPECT OTHER HUMANS AS HAVE MY THREE CHILDREN.

El Bubsio
Can I ask why you have to resort to shouting when people ask you simple questions? Oh, I feel so insulted.

Clifford Loveland
Ah!! But what of the business man who paid them to kill? Are the police looking into arresting him, for he is just as much to blame for this terrible murder.

pjbeckett
Why does it appear to cost so much in gaol in the UK ? --------- because they take total cost of running the prison plus the costs of employing state salaried lawyers then devide the total by the number of people in prison and that gives the answer, hence the money is already spent. Why so

pjbeckett
Why does it appear to cost so much to put someone to death in the USA ? ---- because they keep them for decades after sentencing and state salaried lawyers put in one appeal after another.

El Bubsio
As it should be. With 142 people released from death row in the USA since 1971 after their convictions were quashed, people should be given every opportunity to prove their innocence.

pjbeckett
!42 innocent ? sounds like a case for abolishing trials and punishment altogether. In the US at least. If you`ve got it right.

El Bubsio
If you google 'how many prisoners are released from death row' you can see a list of the names for yourself. It was the first result in the list when I did the search. That only goes to 2012, so the number may be slightly higher by now.

Peter Coates
What about the ring leader who paid them. How long has he got. Nobodies even heard of him. They should all swing.

t.bulgin
I would imagine that they are under a press blackout in case of perjury or somthing like that. Hopefully we will hear soon that he has been given 40 years as well. He is just as guilty after all.
Name witheld
This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

pjbeckett
It would seem to be 40 years each the way it reads.

t.bulgin
Yes, pj, they don't usualy add up sentences without saying "both convicted to a combined total of" or somint.

denisparsons
They should have got the "Sherrifs," to get the money instead of murdering somebody.A life is worth more than £1000!

t.bulgin
Give this judge a medal for growing some at last.

Mikel roi
1. The term will inevitably be deemed too long and will be reduced and if they obey the rules they could be released in just a few years. Remember the Jamie Bulger pair? 2. Note that "they were high on drugs" at the time of the killing and wailing like mad things. They also did it for a low figure because they probably wanted more drug money. Yet the LibDems want to legalise these dangerous drugs!

andrew
40 years? Is that all? Just waiting for the hand wringing Guardian reading dinner party set to complain that the pair who did it had deprived childhoods...........

ann davies
oh well thats british justice. kill some-one and get a roof over your head, better food than hospitals and heating all off the tax payers of this country. bring back hanging - its a crime against the tax payer to keep these type of people alive.





Name witheld
11:32am on 8/2/2013
This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.
romsey1891
12:04pm on 9/2/2013
Yes we probably still are. what was one of the Ten Commandments? Ah yes, " Thou Shall Not Kill"
Name witheld
6:03pm on 9/2/2013
This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.