UK & World News

  • 25 January 2013, 17:02

Barry George Loses Jill Dando Compensation Case

Barry George, who was wrongly jailed for murdering Jill Dando, has lost his High Court bid for compensation.

Two judges rejected his claim that the Justice Secretary unfairly and unlawfully decided he was "not innocent enough to be compensated".

Lord Justice Beatson and Mr Justice Irwin ruled that the Secretary of State was "entirely justified in the conclusion he reached."

Mr George's solicitor, Nick Baird, said: "We are very disappointed with the judgement and we shall be applying for permission to leapfrog the Court of Appeal to have the matter heard before the Supreme Court."

Mr George, 52, spent eight years in jail for the murder of Jill Dando in 1999.

He came to court to seek a reconsideration of his case which could have opened the way for him to claim an award of up to £500,000 for lost earnings and wrongful imprisonment.

But the judges ruled that he had "failed the legal test" to receive an award.

Miss Dando was shot dead outside her home in Fulham in April 1999.

After his conviction in July 2001, Mr George, of Fulham, west London, was acquitted of killing the 37-year-old BBC presenter at a retrial in August 2008.

The high-profile compensation action was one of five test cases assembled to decide who is now entitled to payments in "miscarriage of justice" cases following a landmark decision by the Supreme Court in May 2011.

Ian Lawless, who spent eight years behind bars for murder before being freed by the Court of Appeal in 2009, won his legal challenge.

Mr Lawless was jailed for life in 2002 after confessing to the murder of retired sea captain Alf Wilkins on the Yarborough estate in Grimsby, Lincolnshire.

His conviction was later ruled unsafe after fresh medical evidence revealed he had a "pathological need for attention".

The judges ruled that in his case the decision to refuse compensation was legally flawed and must be reconsidered in the light of their judgement.

 

what do you think?

6 comments

michael jones

3:42pm on 25/1/2013

how can you not be innocent enough?

Score: 7
2 replies

shirley sutton

4:35pm on 25/1/2013

They hadn't got enough evidence for conviction to hold but he was not completely cleared

Score: 3

Name witheld

9:58pm on 25/1/2013

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Craig Walker

4:40pm on 25/1/2013

If you are 'acquitted' of a Murder offence and released, that would make you 'innocent' and of no threat to the public wouldn't it? unless you were 100% NO RISK to the public you wouldn't be released? so, how can someone who has been 'acquitted' on a Murder charge not be 'innocent enough'? The men and women at the forefront of the Justice system are the problem in this country!.and its a serious problem.

Score: 6

TIM x

5:16pm on 25/1/2013

British justice a laughing stock again just as it is with the terrorist Qatada. He has been acquitted by the court in a retrial. Not guilty is not guilty and therefore he should receive the compensation due for his wrongful imprisonment.

Score: 6

jane cumming

5:16pm on 25/1/2013

So hes not innocent enough nor was he guilty enough??????????

Score: 4

john

7:31pm on 25/1/2013

At the time of the murder security experts pointed the finger of guilt at the Serbian secret service acting in revenge for Blair ordering the bombing of a Serbian TV station which resulted in the deaths of sixteen civilians. Barry George was a convenient scapegoat to take the heat off the real villains.

Score: 5

Name witheld

9:56pm on 25/1/2013

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Advertisement