Financial News
Cable Attacks Plans To Make Sackings Easier
Plans to strip down labour rights and make it easier for firms to sack under-performing staff have been labelled "complete nonsense" by Business Secretary Vince Cable.
The Liberal Democrat launched a direct attack on rival MPs who back the proposals, condemning the "ideological zealots who want to encourage British firms to fire at will".
It comes as venture capitalist Adrian Beecroft prepares to publish a far-reaching study recommending a raft of radical employment reforms.
Writing in The Sun, Mr Cable said: "Some people think that if labour rights were stripped down to the most basic minimum, employers would start hiring and the economy would soar again.
"This is complete nonsense. British workers are an asset, not just a cost for company bosses. That is why I am opposed to the ideological zealots who want to encourage British firms to fire at will."
Commissioned by Prime Minister David Cameron, the study is expected to call for firms to be given more flexibility to make redundancies, and an easing of equality rules to boost job creation.
Some of the plans are likely to be backed by Tories, with speculation the Prime Minister could be among those to show their support,
But Mr Cable said: "Those who want to shake up the law need to realise that the days in the 70s and 80s when the unions ruled the roost have long since gone.
"I talk to businesses every day and none of them tell me that their biggest obstacle to employment and growth is troublesome workers who they can't get rid of."
Conservative Party donor Mr Beecroft suggests a number of reforms in his 15-page report, including a reduction of the mandatory consultation period when a company is considering redundancy programmes.
He wants it brought down from 90 to 30 days - or just five if a company is in severe distress.
The report also recommends a cap on loss of earnings compensation for employees who make successful unfair dismissal claims and a removal of some equality laws.
Mr Cable's intervention comes as it emerged that he and Labour leader Ed Miliband had held talks - amid suggestions that tensions between their two parties are starting to improve.
And Labour's shadow business secretary Chuka Umunna accused ministers of jeopardising consumer confidence over the forthcoming report.
"Putting people in fear of losing their jobs will have a huge detrimental impact on consumer confidence," he said.
what do you think?

David Wragg
Is Cable a member of the Cabinet? Yes, he is, so why is he setting out alternative policies?

Alan Todd
Back to Victorian times as Cameloon wanted .Grind the workers down is his motto

Fred Spoons
Time after time I hear and read about people being made redundant. A person cannot be made redundant, it is the job which has to be made redundant. We know redundancy is used by employers as a tool to shed workers with those left behind in employment having to keep their heads down and mouths shut just to keep their job. If an employer seeks to make jobs redundant in their business it seems to me that it should be their job which should go for allowing a redundancy situation to build up.

Byron Eckhardt
If there isn't any demand for a firms product and sales fall how can a firm carry on without changes, is it better to loose half the jobs or all the jobs.

Mick Daniel
As normal, the lib dems are against anything that promotes employmwnt ( factually proven in other countries) and helps business to grow

t.bulgin
Agreed. The socialists on here won't want to listen to facts. they just want to slate the tories.

Christopher Hodson
All part of this dictatorship we are getting there just kill off the rights of people and you are on your way.

Mick Daniel
I suggest you sepnd a time in a dictatorship and then you would stop your whinging

Mick Daniel
I suggest you spend a bit of your time in a dictatorship and you would soon realise how pampered and lucky you are

Byron Eckhardt
Blair was a dictator, brought on big brother, destroyed people s rights did you complain then.

Bazil Brush
as manufacturing is all but dead i suppose sacking a mcdonald worker for not gettin enough stars on there hat is on par for this lot in power

John Poole
Wish we could sack this coalition lot

t.bulgin
we can. in 3 years. what do you propose as an alternative ?

Fred Spoons
Sackings? You've never had it so bad! Come back Maggie; all is forgiven (Only kidding folks)

Byron Eckhardt
Am a suby on building sites, I was sacked on Thursday because I refused to lie to the new starters, instantly, no workers rights for us,when is someone going to help us,Vince.

com196
Byron the building trade is the same as it was in the 50s h/s is a bit better thanks too labour . bit of advice stay away from house builders.

herewegoagain10
Can this please apply to underperforming Prime Ministers and Chancellors? There are ways and means to get rid of workers - performance reviews etc. but this government is immune to reviews and any criticism falls on deaf ears

TheKarmacanic
Well done Vince, you've got to keep those Tories in check. Especially when they're trying to pull a fast one! I defy anyone, who's an employee, to say that they wouldn't want to now the reason why they were being dismissed! I think I'm right in saying, that if you were to sign on after losing a job, you're often asked why you left your last job. What are you supposed to say? I don't know because they wouldn't tell me! Why can't an employer simply tell an employee why they're being sacked? If there's a legitimate reason there should be no problem. This is just being done to obstruct a former employee from suing for unfair dismissal, in short it's a sackers charter!

com196
well well Mr Cameron you are just like your mother thatcher . she did this sort of thing in the 80s that's right 4million on the dole

B. Wise
Cameron and Clegg need to be sacked. Mind you we could end up with Ed Balls and his wife running the country if Labour were voted in. Now that would be a calamity.

dave
Economic crises are essential to capitalism. They are created deliberately in order for the powerful to clamp down hard on the working people, with the fault being placed on the 'recession'. It helps to maintain the status quo by instilling fear of unemployment in working people. That is why capitalism requires workers who are male, married with a mortgage and children, and the male in the family being the only source of income. They will do exactly as they are told because they cannot take risks.

TheKarmacanic
Nicely put Dave. If I can mix my metaphors a little... You've hit the nail right on the head and encapsulated it in a rather large nutshell. I totally agree!

johnmstg42ml
Trouble is Vince Cable is Lib Dem, more faces than a townhall clock.

David Wragg
SACK CABLE NOW!
Name witheld
This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.








Eric Coster
1:42pm on 21/5/2012
Bussinesses must be able to sack anyone for any reason and without time constraints being imposed, how will they ever be able to employ Indian workers on Indian wages (look up EU open access mode 4). Look at China we have to be a sweat shop nation to complete in this new dawn for mankind. Shame about the good people who died in all modern wars to make this Country a decend place to live.
Byron Eckhardt
5:34pm on 21/5/2012
Germanys not a sweat shop nation