UK & World News

  • 30 May 2012, 17:05

Charles Taylor Gets 50 Years For War Crimes

Former Liberian president Charles Taylor, the first African leader to be convicted of war crimes, has been jailed for 50 years.

The 64-year-old is likely to serve his term in the UK as Britain is the only country to say it is willing to take him in.

Taylor was found guilty last month of aiding and arming rebels who killed and mutilated thousands in neighbouring Sierra Leone during a brutal civil war which went on for more than a decade.

In the UN-backed war crimes court near The Hague, judge Richard Lussick said there was no legal precedent by which to determine a sentence, but the term was intended to reflect Taylor's position of authority.

"He was found responsible for aiding and abetting some of the most heinous and brutal crimes in recorded history," he said, reading out the sentencing.

"Leadership must be carried out by example by the prosecution of crimes not the commission of crimes."

He said the sentence is intended to "underscore the gravity it attached to the betrayal of public trust."

The prosecution demanded an 80-year sentence in one of Britain's maximum security jails, but Taylor appealed for a shorter sentence.

Both sides are expected to appeal.

Taylor is the first head of state to be convicted by an international tribunal since the Nazi trials at Nuremberg, after he became notorious for feeding the illicit trade in blood or conflict diamonds.

Taylor was convicted of 11 counts of murder, rape, conscripting child soldiers and sexual slavery during the civil war in Sierra Leone.

More than 120,000 people were killed.

Reacting from Sierra Leone, deputy minister of information Sheka Tarawalie said: "Today the people of Sierra Leone, the victims, and ordinary observers inside and outside the country would believe that some kind of justice has been done."

Geraldine Mattioli-Zeltner of Human Rights Watch said: "It is really significant that Taylor's status as a former head of state was taken as an aggravating factor as far as his sentence was concerned."

The trial, which saw model Naomi Campbell testify she had received diamonds from Taylor at a dinner hosted by Nelson Mandela, finished in March 2011.

what do you think?

20 comments

aa aa

10:17am on 30/5/2012

He was given 80 years, and appealed, so they gave him 50. Excellent. We need that judge in this country. He could do a master class on how to sentence properly. The old idiots in our courts haven't got a scooby doo. Rapist given 7 years, wins the lottery in prison !!! ends up doing 4 years. Some people get that for fraud.

Score: 8
1 reply

John Walsh

3:32pm on 30/5/2012

Rapist given 7 years, wins the lottery in prison !!! ends up doing 4 years. AND THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH!

Score: 2

stevie may

10:25am on 30/5/2012

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Lorgar Aurelian

10:27am on 30/5/2012

Why is the UK taking him? Liberia was created an American colony (remember, those guys who said colonies were BAAAAD) so why can't the yanks take him?

Score: 6

mike.kilbride

10:30am on 30/5/2012

Why our prison? let his country pay for his encarsaration

Score: 6
3 replies

Viv hanshall

1:03pm on 30/5/2012

Encarsaration (Sic) ??!! Incarceration (Good grief, learn to spell)

Score: 4

Julie Crumpton

2:01pm on 30/5/2012

Ok vic....mr perfect! So are you going to make a worthwhile comment.....or just extract the urine out of people!

Score: 2

Julie Crumpton

2:02pm on 30/5/2012

Whoops! VIV!!!

Score: 2

Steve Bloom

10:31am on 30/5/2012

So this man doesn't want to spend his jail time in a British jail as he is a family man and it would be difficult for his family to visit him. WHO CARES. He should never be aloud to see anyone of his family. Keep him in solitary confinement.

Score: 6
1 reply

bjnk

1:33pm on 30/5/2012

More likely to be his family will get assisted prison visits, airfare, hotels etc all on the British taxpayer.

Score: 3

Sharon Houghton

11:02am on 30/5/2012

Blood boiling time, why is the UK the only country 'willing' to take him in. Why clutter our prisons with more monsters from other countries, who's paying. Great Britain the worlds Biggest dumping ground, so wave ur jubilee flags with pride, cause we r laughing stock.

Score: 8

Stephen Dee

11:17am on 30/5/2012

Well blow me - another slap in the face for the Great British public eh?! Is it ok that I pay my contribution to this mans meal tickets, bed and board for the next fifty years while I'm standing in line to pay my fine for putting the bins out an hour early. I presume it's ok to pay at the post office while I pay my ridiculous road tax for driving over a few dozen pot-holes on the way home.

Score: 8
1 reply

Thyssen Clifford

12:01pm on 30/5/2012

So true hope he gets whot he deserves in prison

Score: 5

Mark Wallis

12:04pm on 30/5/2012

more like the uk is the only country to take him in beceause of our track record of letting asylum seekers in at the tax payers expense, keep it up britain!

Score: 8

info

12:56pm on 30/5/2012

That's right, dump all the dross on our doorstep. We'll take 'em in. How does he like his eggs in the morning and does he want a morning call?

Score: 7

nick

12:59pm on 30/5/2012

He'll be out in 6 months for good behaviour and straight into a council house on benefits

Score: 6

info

1:03pm on 30/5/2012

Scale of government's ability to look after it's own people. 10 = good 0 = dire Conservatives 0 Labour 0 LibDems 0 Green Party 0 Independance Party 0 Raving Looney Party 0 Oh sorry the last one's already in.

Score: 5

Davy Nichols

1:26pm on 30/5/2012

I would be very supprised if he was put into a normal run of the mill prison He would want a POSH PRISON.. as he does have rights .... you know How much would this cost the British Tax Payer.. ( per month )

Score: 3

bjnk

1:28pm on 30/5/2012

Cameron, May, get your heads out of the sand, we don't want this monster or his family anywhere near our shores.

Score: 4

Gary Mcclelland

1:50pm on 30/5/2012

this goverment need to put uk first not helping all these others out and as for taking this mass murderer its the most stupid thing i heard why why then we have to fit the bill its time this goverment quit and let the ppl of uk do a better job cameron if know one else wants him ask urself why HES A MASS MURDERER stop this from happening

Score: 4

ali baba

2:21pm on 30/5/2012

It's funny how super powers never get stitched up for war crimes. China, Brazil and Russia are the super powers of the future, going to be interesting to see what strategy they implement for Europe.

Score: 2

John Poole

2:51pm on 30/5/2012

I wonder how many years Blair and Bush are going to get?

Score: 7

shirley sutton

3:23pm on 30/5/2012

Why are we taking him in - us taxpayers footing the bill yet again totally sucks If the iu n tried him the u n can jail him.

Score: 1

Mike Anon

3:28pm on 30/5/2012

So & I quote, "it is likely that he will serve his term in the UK as only Britain will take him". That's just typical. All costs of keeping this murderer will fall to the British tax payer. Why are we ALWAYS the patsies? This government needs to wake up!

Score: 2

TIM x

4:17pm on 30/5/2012

50 years? 80 years? And fighting over it? Why not just say life and be done with it! And as usual Britain has to take care of another foreign criminal. Who you and I will pay to keep. What a joke!

Score: 1

ffreem200

7:02pm on 30/5/2012

Death sentence for comes against humanity nothing less

Score: 1
Advertisement