EU Budget: Leaders 'Close To New Deal'
European leaders have agreed the broad lines of a deal on a seven-year budget that would fix total EU spending at 960bn euros (£820bn).
"We feel pretty confident that we have the framework for a deal," one EU official told reporters.
"The deal is not completely finalised, but we feel sure it will be done today."
The proposal would set a limit of 960bn euros (£820bn) for projects the EU can promise to fund between 2014 and 2020.
But not all those projects will ever be completed, meaning the maximum amount it will ever pay out is 908.4bn euros (£774bn).
The current spending limit is 942.8bn euros (£803.4bn) so the actual spending cap looks like it will be reduced by 34.4bn euros (£29.3bn).
The 960bn euro (£820bn) ceiling also represents more than a 12bn euro (£10.2bn) cut from the proposals put forward in November, when the 27 EU member states failed to strike a deal.
Friday's breakthrough came at dawn after 15 hours of intense negotiations between countries in the bloc.
Leaders, including Prime Minister David Cameron, are continuing to negotiate the draft document in the expectation that they can sign off on a final agreement before the weekend, officials said.
The deal is expected to strike a balance between the demands of northern European countries, such as Britain and the Netherlands that wanted a belt-tightening EU budget, and countries in the south and east that wanted sustained spending on farming subsidies and much-needed infrastructure.
Sky News Deputy Political Editor Joey Jones, reporting from Brussels, said: "This is the make or break meeting and leaders, including David Cameron, have been given a draft that lays out the budget."
Mr Cameron is likely to claim victory if the actual spending cap is reduced to 908.4bn euros (£774bn). It would constitute the first budget cut in the EU's 56-year history.
Sky News Europe Correspondent Robert Nisbet said: "Some may view this for [Mr Cameron] as a success.
"David Cameron left saying what he wanted was at least a real terms freeze and it looks as if there is a cut."
But he added that the reduced EU budget would not necessarily mean British taxpayers pay less since UK commitments to the EU could still rise.
In the draft proposals cuts fall mainly on a new fund for cross-border transport, energy and telecoms projects, slashed by more than 11bn euros (£9.36bn), and on pay and perks for EU officials - a top target for Britain - reduced by around 1bn euros (£900m).
Spending on policies boosting jobs and growth see big increases - but not as big as originally demanded by the European Commission.
As well as the deal needing to be signed off by all EU leaders, it must be approved by the European Parliament, an obstacle that could prove difficult.
The European Parliament president has said he will not accept excessive cuts.
Ahead of the summit, France and Britain appeared at sharp odds over the headline numbers, with Denmark, the Netherlands and Sweden lining up on Britain's side and Italy, Spain, Poland and others allied with France. Germany was left in the middle.
what do you think?
And how much will be wasted on Admin. Freebies for the MEPs etc
Ivor you can bet it will not go down in real terms
Soooo, cut to the chaise, EU Budget.. those countries who take out more than they put in want to greatly increase the EU spend, and those countries who put in more then they take out want to control the spend, with Germany trying to keep the whole nonsence (sorry process) churning on regardless. "and others" presumably, Greece, Portugal etc with next year Romainia, Bulgaria blaa blaa.
derek of course Germany wants to keep the process going someone's political future is at stake and to hell with everything else. How did that TV add go 'Sir the peasants are revolting - yes they are'
So most of our laws remain under Brussels control and we continue to get screwed ever so slightly less. Gailor/torturer to victim on the rack - "this is your lucky day, I'm only going to turn up the pain to 9.9 instead of 10."
gengis without Brussels control they would all be out of a job mmmmmmmmm that would be nice though
It is the terms of membership that is unacceptable more than the notion of membership itself. We signed up to a ''club'' that allowed free trade between us and our European neighbours. Instead of which we are paying in excess 50 million pounds a day to a scam that makes 70% of our laws, and has not been officially audited for 17 years. Cameron has got to get a proper result, or we should get out, however good the original intention may have once been.