UK & World News
Extradited Briton's 'Barbaric' Days In Jail

British businessman Christopher Tappin has said he felt himself "slipping away" after suffering "barbaric" treatment in a US jail.
Mr Tappin was extradited to the US on arms dealing charges in February.
In an interview with The Times, he says he spent 10 "barbaric" days in solitary confinement.
He added that he was deprived of food and access to the British consul in the Otero County detention centre in New Mexico, despite having yet to stand trial.
Mr Tappin, from Orpington, Kent, was freed on bail on Wednesday after his family paid $50,000 dollars of a $1m bond.
He told the newspaper there had been a "presumption of guilt from the very beginning" by authorities.
"Psychologically I felt myself slipping away...I can't tell you how difficult it was," he said. "They were mentally excruciating days."
The 65-year-old also described how after being freed from solitary confinement he was kept in a cell with other inmates, all requiring protection from the rest of the prison population.
But he said he watched six of them fight so viciously on the first day that two were given solitary confinement.
Mr Tappin befriended a fellow inmate, a 65-year-old former judge called Luther Jones, who was convicted of corruption.
The two played chess and gin rummy, sharing 23 hours a day together in their cell.
They would be allowed three visits to the canteen a day, but given only three minutes to eat.
Mr Tappin told The Times that they would trade food to persuade other inmates to let them watch the news.
His family said they were planning to visit him in Texas, where he must stay, as soon as possible.
Speaking after the judge set the terms of his release, Mr Tappin's wife Elaine said she was "grateful for the judge's humanity", adding "we are making arrangements to visit him as soon as we can".
Mr Tappin, who ran a freight forwarding company, denies selling batteries for surface-to-air missiles to Iran.
He faces up to 35 years in prison if convicted at his trial in El Paso, Texas.
His extradition follows an investigation which began in 2005 when US agents asked technology providers about buyers who might have raised suspicions.
Those customers were then approached by undercover companies set up by government agencies.
Update:
Hello, regular commenting on Orange News and Sport pages closes on Thursday 30 May 2013. We will continue to provide a commenting facility on major news and sport events on orangeworld.co.uk. Contact us via http://oran.ge/OWfeedback if you have any further questions. Thanks.
what do you think?

TheKarmacanic
This is very good news for Mr Tappin as he cannot seriously be regarded as a flight risk.

David Wragg
It is good news, but why is there in the first place? The charges should have been tested in a British court, and if found valid, he should have had the chance for the case to be heard in a British court.

jonny english
You forget David, the yanks say "jump" and cameron asks "how high"

David Wragg
Yes, Jonny, that sounds just like Cameron. According to a newspaper article earlier this week, he sees being a good prime minister as being able to keep his in-tray in good order. Pathetic!

David Wragg
This is a disgrace. The charges have not been tested in a British court. He was refused bail at first, and the cost of defending himself in the US is such that he may be forced to do a plea bargain, even if innocentr, in the hope of getting a short sentence. Worse awaits as unless we exercise our opt out, any country in the EU will be able to do the same to British citizens from 2014. Cameron, of course, cannot be trusted to exercise the opt out. The principle that no one can be extradited for something that is not a breach of British law will be lost forever.
Name witheld
This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

info
America supplied Iran with a whole lot more than batteries in the past, so why are they not up for jail terms. Nobody knows what is behind all this, but I sure as hell do not trust the US to give a fair trial to our citizens. He should have been investigated in the UK, an only then, if there were charges to be made they should be brought here and extradited as a last resort. Easier still, changed his religion to 'the other religion' then he would be safe from prosecution.

d and d Phillips
Another example of Cameron the Wimp not standing up for us!





Name witheld
9:54am on 27/4/2012
This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.