Full Steam Ahead For HS2 Despite Criticism
The Government has said it will work to minimise the negative aspects of a new high-speed rail link between London and Birmingham as it gives the controversial project the go-ahead.
Transport Secretary Justine Greening told MPs in Parliament it was time Britain updated its Victorian railways for the 21st Century.
She said it was not a decision she had taken lightly "or without great consideration of the impact on those who are affected by the route".
In a bid to try and diffuse local residents' anger about the project, Ms Greening announced extra tunnelling on some parts of the route including Amersham, Ruislip, Greatworth, Aston le Walls, Wendover and Long Itchington Wood.
She said the changes meant that more than half the route would be out of sight in tunnels or cuttings.
But her statement was met with loud booing from outraged residents in Great Missenden in Buckinghamshire.
The new HS2 project will cut journeys between the two cities from the current time of one hour and 24 minutes to just 49 minutes.
But the London to Birmingham segment is expected to cost £17bn and extending it to Manchester and Leeds a further £15bn.
"High Speed 2 is a scheme to deliver hugely enhanced rail capacity and connectivity between Britain's major conurbations," Ms Greening added.
"It is the largest transport infrastructure investment in the UK for a generation, and, with the exception of High Speed 1, is the first major new railway line since the Victorian era."
She said she had been "mindful that we must safeguard the natural environment as far as possible, both for the benefit of those enjoying our beautiful countryside today and for future generations".
The route, which cuts through areas of outstanding natural beauty, has provoked criticism from locals.
One of those areas is The Chilterns in Buckinghamshire, where residents have organised a campaign group to fight the proposals.
"When schools are closed, teachers are losing their jobs... it is just unviable," said resident Alison Kenny.
"I can't believe we're still here having this conversation and the Government is still going ahead. It's just a vanity project. It's nothing more."
Steve Roddick, chief officer of The Chilterns Conservation Board, said: "It looks like this is all about how do you get to London more quickly.
"It's absolutely not the way to provide prosperity in the Midlands and the North, to make all these great cities suburbs of London. And that's the way it begins to look."
The plans have also divided politicians with Welsh Secretary Cheryl Gillan, who represents affected Chesham and Amersham, previously threatening to quit over the issue.
Homes in rural Conservative seats are among the hardest hit by the plans.
Trains are expected to start running along the new line in 2026. It will then be extended in a Y-shape to serve Leeds and Manchester, with reduced travel times to Liverpool and Glasgow by 2032.
The Department for Transport said: "HS2 is not just about getting between London, Birmingham, Leeds and Manchester more quickly, but bringing faster services and many more seats to towns and cities well beyond the HS2 network.
"It would work just like a motorway. No-one uses a motorway to get all the way from their front door to their final destination, but they use it because it offers high capacity and faster services - precisely what HS2 will offer rail passengers."
Union leaders and business leaders have supported the project, arguing that it will be a boost to the economy and help bring the country's rail network up-to-date and in line with international competitors.
The proposals still need to be approved by Parliament, but today's announcement by Justine Greening is a major step towards implementation.
Lucy James from the Campaign for High Speed Rail welcomed the move and said it would deliver "more seats, more trains, more jobs and more growth" for Britain.
Former transport secretary Lord Adonis told Sky News the Government must also give a firm commitment the line will be extended to Leeds, Manchester and beyond.
"The Government really must get a move on - it is nearly two years since I announced the high-speed plan, they spent two years consulting, a consultation which could have taken six months," he said.
Lord Adonis said he supports "proper compensation" for residents directly affected.
"The rule with high speed rail is everyone wants the stations but no one wants the lines, well the line has to go somewhere so ultimately the Government has to take the decision," he added.
what do you think?
is this going to be a U K only project for the country, or have lobbyists already taken an interest to assist overseas companies, to supply their people and goods in these harsh economic times,similar to the London Olympics.
The government would do far better if it made the existing routes cheaper, £32 billion to about 1/2 hour !!! crazy.
I think the rail netwoek has been a product of major un-investment for too long now. However, is this a bit like Springfields mono-rail?
It will bring the rail network up to date? By 2026 it'll be out of date again and we'll still be behind Europe to the cost of £32 billion!
trying telling Cameloon the Dictator that no-one wants this high speed link which will get you to Birmingham 20 minutes earlier. He doesn't care what the people of this country want - well, not the poorest people anyway. I am just glad I do not live anywhere near where this line will be but I do feel sorry for people who will lose their houses and land. How many in the cabinet will that affect?
Edmund Keith Gray
ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT SHOULD HAVE BEEN BUILT 50 YEARS AGO
Exactly the problem. It should of been built decades ago. Because successive govt's have put it off it's now ridiculously expensive.
Let's see if the Tory minister is true to her word and resigns over this. Or will the thought of resigning a lucrative cabinet post outweigh her concerns for her constituents.
Triciat 13 what are the poorest people. I was amazed to learn that Bob Crowe of the rail union is on 164,000 a year and lives in a Council house. So much for the Unions being for the working man.
Total waste of money!!!! at least we now know why our country is in so much debt when we go around throwing money at something as stupid as this project,if you want to make the railway network go better add new coaches so people dont have to stand from bristol to london outside the toilet like idiots we accept this instead of complaining,we buy tickets to sit on a train and everytime i get on one im standing outside the toilet or in the gaps between carraiges and yet still paying full price for the ticket,please government get your priorities right comfort before speed
TERRIBLE, TERRIBLE NEWS......in these days of austerity when health, education,and roads are falling apart the "Goverment want to spend billions and billions.....and billions of tax payers money so that the private rail companys can make money.....as someone said....its a white Elephant.......and a BIG ONE !!
What a nonsense. Orange has used an image of a similar line in the Netherlands which has just had to be rescued by the Ducth taxpayer. There are many smaller improvements to our railway network that would provide better results, eliminating some bottlenecks. In addition, environmental concerns stopped Heathrow having a third runway, but this project will affect a far wider area.
Correction, they are now using HS1, which few people can afford tomuse!
And I suppose the construction work will go to british workers. NOT A CHANCE
The government are on another planet!an insane project that will benefit only the london based minority. there are so so many other places this money can be better used
I thought corruption was only in other goverments, how wrong I was, that's the only way they agreed to do this, some one has received a big pay out to accept this. It will ruin my local area, a complete waste of money, foreign company's will get the contracts.
How much !!!!!!!!!!!!! Watch this one spiral out of control.
How much !!!!!!! Watch this one spiral out of control