Entertainment News

  • 9 January 2013, 9:57

Jessie J: 'Instagram tweet was not about Rihanna'

Jessie J has dismissed reports suggesting a recent Twitter.com post about stars posting naked pictures of themselves online was targeted at pop peer Rihanna.

The Price Tag hitmaker took to the microblogging site earlier this week and appeared to mock the R&B singer's penchant for uploading candid photos of herself naked and smoking pot on Instagram.

She wrote, "I'm bored... Maybe I should get naked and smoke and take pictures of myself and post them on instagram? Or NOT... *rolls eyes*".

The Voice star had to assure Rihanna fans who had been upset by the tweet that the note wasn't aimed at the Umbrella singer.

She explained, "My last tweet about instagram sadly wasn't an indirect (sic) at anyone in particular. There is definitely more than 1 person posting those kind of pictures. Hence my tweet."

But she admitted the tweet was a message to stars like Rihanna, adding, "I will openly say the amount of pictures including men and woman nude and girls and guys promoting smoking drugs on the internet these days is a lot. Feels like the boundaries are disappearing. It's become fashionable and in my opinion it's too much. Call me what you want but that's MY opinion and I'm entitled to one."

Last week, Rihanna, who often disrobes for candid Twitter and Instagram shots, took aim at followers who lashed out at her for appearing to promote marijuana by posting a shot of the drug online and writing, "This nug (nugget) look like a skull or am I just (hallucinating)....?"

She was attacked for setting a bad example for young fans but defiant Rihanna fired back with a tweet that read, "I DON'T REALLY GIVE A F**K."

Update:

Hello, regular commenting on Orange News and Sport pages closes on Thursday 30 May 2013. We will continue to provide a commenting facility on major news and sport events on orangeworld.co.uk. Go to http://orangeworld.co.uk/p/helpandcosts/feedback if you have any further questions. Thanks.

what do you think?

2 comments

movvi

5:13pm on 9/1/2013

"Wasn't indirect" suggests it WAS direct. She doesn't say what it was though - wasn't an indirect what?! It's hardly readable at all. These people should maybe leave the house for a bit. Get a dog; check out the forest; do something.

Score: 2

t.bulgin

1:22pm on 10/1/2013

Phew !.....I almost made a comment about this rubbish but stopped myself at the last second. Can't afford to be wasting my time commenting on non-stories about non-entities. Got better things to do.

Score: 1
Advertisement