UK & World News
Killer Breivik: I Acted Out Of Goodness
The Norwegian far-right activist who killed 77 people last year has told a court that he was fighting a battle against multi-culturalism and acted out of "goodness, not evil".
Reading from a 13-page document that he wrote in custody, Anders Behring Breivik defended his massacre and called it the most "spectacular attack by a nationalist militant since World War Two".
He said he would repeat his actions again, if he could.
"Yes, I would do it again," he said, adding that life in prison or dying for "his people" would be "the biggest honour".
The 33-year-old lashed out at the Norwegian and other European governments for embracing immigration and multi-culturalism and claimed he was a "second-rate citizen".
He said the aim of the killings was for "racial purity" and to "change the direction of multi-cultural drift to avoid greater confrontation and civil war".
He claimed the only way he could "protect the white native Norwegian" was through violence.
"People will understand me one day and see that multi-culturalism has failed. If I am right, how can what I did be illegal?" he said.
During cross examination, Breivik claimed to be the "cell commander" of an anti-communist and anti-Islamic militant group called the Knights Templar, adding he was "one of three one-man cells" in Norway.
Prosecutors have said the group does not exist.
He also claimed he was on a "suicide mission" and "didn't expect to survive the day" of the attacks.
During his testimony, which was expected to last 30 minutes but overran by an hour, there were numerous interruptions by the judge who asked Breivik to moderate his language and curtail the length of his address.
There were also several people in the Oslo courtroom who were seen yawning.
Sky's Europe correspondent Robert Nisbet, who is at the court, said: "It was a rambling speech.
"He delved into history he made references to World War Two, Tibet and Enoch Powell's Rivers of Blood speech, and a lot of it didn't make sense."
Journalist Trygve Sorvaag, who is tweeting inside the court for Sky News, said: "For many people, it was very surprising to hear how soft, almost nasal, his voice was. He didn't appear dangerous in any way.
"It was very hard to see that this softly spoken man is actually the person who murdered 77 people."
A survivor of the massacre, Bjoern Magnus Jacobsen Ihler, spoke to Sky News after Breivik's testimony.
"It was very difficult for me in many ways to sit in the same room as the man who killed many of my friends, and who tried to kill me," he said.
"But it was good to see him in this position because he is very reduced from where he was, and he can't harm me anymore."
Breivik's testimony began after proceedings were delayed by almost an hour because of a court crisis meeting.
The trial was thrown into confusion after lawyers on all sides requested that a lay judge should not continue to sit on the five-judge panel for saying that the "only fair outcome" for Breivik was the death penalty.
Thomas Indreboe admitted posting the comment on Facebook the day after Breivik's massacre on July 22.
Norway does not have the death penalty.
Judge Wenche Elizabeth Arntzen returned to the court to announce that Mr Indreboe had been dismissed and replaced by back-up lay judge Elisabeth Wisloeff.
Breivik is being tried by a panel of two professional judges and three lay judges. The system is designed to let ordinary citizens have a role in the Norwegian justice system.
On Monday at the start of his trial, Breivik pleaded not guilty to charges of terrorism and murder but said he "acknowledges the acts" and that he killed in "self-defence".
His lawyer, Geir Lippestad, said that while the court must consider Breivik's mental state at the time of the attacks, it was the defendant's wish to be sentenced as legally sane.
If Breivik is found sane, he faces 21 years in prison for the killings - although the sentence may be extended indefinitely if he is still considered a threat to society.
If he is found insane, he could spend the rest of his life on the closed psychiatric ward, a fate he has declared would be "worse than death".
Breivik has admitted detonating a fused bomb in the centre of Oslo and opening fire on people attending a youth summer camp on Utoya island.
He claims the attacks were a political act designed to prevent what he describes as an Islamic invasion of Norway.
On the day his attack, Breivik first targeted Oslo's government district with a 950kg car bomb, which killed eight people and injured more than 200.
Then on Utoya, where the youth wing of the country's Labour Party was holding its annual summer camp, he killed 69 people and injured another 33.
what do you think?

Karl Knight
This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Julie Doughty
That is the max in Norwegian law im afraid.

martin6677
He would still only be 54 at the time of his release, and quite capable of killing again, which he has stated he would do. The likeliest outcome is that his sentence will be extended indefinitely, lasting until his natural death.

TheKarmacanic
I think if Norway really wanted to, they could pass legislation to change long term prison sentences for mass murder. However, if he's declared insane he will most probably be detained indefinitely!

Roger Siviter
This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Phylip de la Maziere
This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Peter Coates
what a great message this send out to all the unbalanced people there around.

Mikel roi
The Norwegians sre not doing any of us a favour by giving this self declared mass killer the right to spout his extreme views and to enter a ludicrous plea of not guilty. All this very accomadating approach will be noted by extremists terrorists around the EU and by lawyers and judiciary who hold obsessive views on the rights of defendents and convicted killers - over the rights of peaceful citizens and innocent victims. Mark my words - this is a big mistake they are making and not fair to all those who died in the twin events.

Roger Siviter
He is not yet a 'convicted' killer and as dispicable an act that he's being tried for, he as in all trials does have the right to speak in his defence. This will ensure that no-one can ever claim his trial was unfair. He will certainly never again taste freedom!

Oliver McEvoy
This man knew exactly what he was doing, he planned, schemed and carried out not one 'operation' but two terrorist 'operations' meticulously planned and carried out to to a degree of horror in order to provoke a backlash against those who do not agree with his & others gruesome politics. He is a sane cunning individual and will continue with his rotten politics and his nasty influence and many who view our world from the same sick attitude will no doubt will form a sort of hero worship. I'm hoping that when he is sentenced that the Norwegian government will have the sense to close him down and prevent him from any sort of communication with the outside which is essiently what he has done to 70+ young people and adults.

jonny english
Funny, socialists Tony Bliar and his boss Mr Bush killed thousands, and now socialist Cameron is doing the same! But you don't see them in court, but they are socialists and in control of the killing, and of the police the courts the judges.........

TheKarmacanic
If you think Tony Blair is a socialist, then you're seriously misguided. However, if you think George Bush and David Cameron are socialists, then you're way on the path to becoming as deluded as Anders Breivik!!

James Poulton
@TheKarmacanic Thats is the funniest comment i have ever seen. You couldn't be more wrong.

TheKarmacanic
I think the thumbs up/down say it all! But tell us Jimbo, with your wonderful powers of incisiveness... What is the truth?

James Poulton
New labour, New socialism not ringing any bells?

TheKarmacanic
I seem to remember the Labour Party dropped the dreaded 'S' word (clause IV) in the mid 1990s. Are you saying that Cameron is the heir to Blair (as he once said himself)? I see Cameron as more of a 'One Nation Conservative'... You must admit that UK politics is now fought on the centre ground, surely?

Roger Siviter
Sorry, but I have to agree with karmacanic on this one. I do however, hope against hope that the world will see both Bush & Blair on trial for war crimes against humanity after their illegal and dispicable war in Iraq!

Chris Robinson
Blair, Bush and Cameron socialists? What planet do you live on, jonny? If you see THEM as socialists, Christ, you must be somewhere to the right of Genghis Khan.

AliBumin
What great publicity he`s getting for his cause.

Roger Rushkin
He may be getting publicity for his so called 'cause' but the important point is that Norway is rejecting his so called 'cause' . By putting this man on trial, in an open and fair hearing, Norway is saying that it does not accept his attempt to undermine pluralism and democracy.

TheKarmacanic
Extremely well put Roger, I have to agree.

Malcolm Gylee
His actions are totally wrong! and even if he believes that multi-racialism will lead, inevitably, to civil war in those countries that support multi-racialism, the solution is not to use random; undirected and uncontrolled violence. Political solutions need to be found and a degree of tolerance needs to be established on all sides. If that doesn't work then more considered and radical action may be needed.

fish41
his arguement would be it was directed and controlled. I just dont get why he chose that target

Roger Siviter
How about the radical action of having a democratic referendum and let the people speak?

fish41
all this is doing is determining what colour wall paper he will have in his cell rather than how many volts they should put through him or how far he should drop before the noose breaks his neck. Lets get this despicable act in focus. 77 dead. How many innocent dead in Iraq from coalition bombing? several hundred thousand

Rob Shaw
If he considers being put in a mental ward "a fate worse than death" then give it to him. He needs to pay for what he did and putting him in prison wont be punishment if he wants to go there "for his cause"

TheKarmacanic
You may well be right. There could be a determination amongst the authorities to try to find him insane if possible. That would then allow them to detain him indefinitely!

Windows Live User
No doubt about it multi-culturalism and rainbow nations have failed, but was his way the answer? I think not. I agree with Malcolm below when he says Political solutions need to be found and a degree of tolerance applied but until the correct solution is found

Graeme James Robert Watson
To me the Norwegian law is a joke 21 yrs for 77 lives = 3 months per life Iv read some other comments saying 21 yrs is the maximum sentence but in my view this monster should b strapped to a table with a needle in his arm

dave
By allowing him to speak out Norway is showing the world that democracy is far superior to the Far Right fanatics who would murder people for being 'lefties', 'liberals', 'homosexuals', 'paedophiles', etc. In fact his views are not too dissimilar to some of those that are expressed on this site of people claiming that they want to 'purify' society, or see 'justice' done. I presume that by 'justice' they mean getting rid of people who have different views to themselves. Why do we forget about the effects of so called 'cleansing' like that in Germany in the 1930s, USSR under Stalin, USA under McCarthy and the Balkans in the 1990s?

TheKarmacanic
Very well said Dave! I know what you mean, there are several people airing their views on this forum who would've been better off living in 1930s Germany! It seems they can't stand anyone disagreeing with them without resorting to abuse, which truly is the last refuge of the ignorant!

Ekki Bumscatz
While I don't agree with the bomb or the shooting, I personally agree with some of his views. Europe will eventually be over-run with muslims and the like, we are - unfortunately - far too quick to invite anyone into our countries. Everyone has different views on everything. People will shout for 'justice' when people think differently, that's the sad truth. Orange will probably delete my message as they don't like anybody speaking differently than the rest of the sheep, however, how are the messages stating he should be hung, shot etc any different?

Tricky One
"Europe will eventually be over-run with muslims and the like" Maybe. Probably not.






Stephen Deal
6:43am on 17/4/2012
Instead of giving him a platform to air his views, as he has prepared the document already, it should be read out by someone else. People like him enjoy the self importance that being allowed to read out his 'manifesto' will bring. Deflate his ego by taking that away from him.
Roger Siviter
1:44pm on 17/4/2012
Justice must be fair and seen to be fair and that means the accused having the right to defend himself, think Nurenberg!
Stephen Deal
9:06pm on 17/4/2012
He has written his own defence. I am not suggesting that it isn't heard. However he shouldn't be given the opportunity to voice that defence, it should be read out by an infependent party, noone associated with either prosecution or defence.