UK & World News
Syria: Shelling 'Kills 56' Amid Anger At Veto
At least 56 people have reportedly been killed in further shelling of Syrian cities, amid widespread anger at China and Russia's move to block a UN resolution on the crisis.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported the figure, which follows claims of more than 300 deaths at the beginning of the weekend.
Half of those killed in the latest flashpoints were civilians in the cities of Homs, Daraya and Idlib, according to the UK-based group.
The news came as Arab and Western leaders pledged to continue attempts to end the violence in Syria.
British Foreign Secretary William Hague agreed Russia and China had "blood on their hands" and that their veto had emboldened President Bashar Assad's regime.
The vote came a day after Syrian security forces bombarded the city of Homs - and are thought to have killed around 350 people in the worst night of bloodshed of the 11-month uprising.
France has suggested the EU will strengthen sanctions against Syria in the wake of the veto.
And Mr Hague told Sky News' Murnaghan show that while military action was not being contemplated, a decision had not been made about whether diplomatic ties with Damascus would be cut.
He backed Arab League plans to press ahead with efforts to secure a peaceful political transition.
"This is a doomed regime as well as a murdering regime," he said.
"There is no way it can get its credibility back, internationally or with its own people. It's when you realise that you see what a mistake Russia is making by backing this regime to the very end.
"The main way forward now is for the Arab League to pursue their plan in any case," he said.
"They do not need the permission of the United Nations, although it would have been good to have a clear mandate.
"They should pursue their plan, they should intensify their own pressure on the Assad regime to stop the killing and allow a peaceful political transition.
"Arab League foreign ministers are meeting in a few days' time. We will be having discussions with some of them and will encourage them very much to intensify their own pressure."
Former Prime Minister Sir John Major told the BBC's Andrew Marr show that Russia and China were "effectively giving the green light for a pretty bad regime to murder people".
He added that the UN should spearhead moves to resolve the crisis through diplomatic means.
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton joined international condemnation of the veto, saying: "What happened yesterday at the United Nations was a travesty."
Colonel Riad al Asaad, commander of the rebel Free Syrian Army, said the failure of the UN Security Council resolution meant "there is no other road" except military action by his fighters to topple President Assad.
He described the veto as a "strike against the Syrian people," not just the opposition.
But the Arab League's secretary-general Nabil Elaraby said in a statement that the veto "does not negate that there is clear international support for the resolutions of the Arab League".
Meanwhile, video purportedly shot on Sunday in Homs appeared to show evidence that residential areas were being shelled, although Sky News has no way of verifying the footage.
Other videos, which have appeared on social media websites and are also not possible to verify, featured graphic images of injuries apparently suffered by Homs residents including children.
The bloc's resolution had called for President Assad to step down so talks with the opposition could start.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov is due to visit Syria on Tuesday, when his ministry said he would push for speedy democratic reforms.
"Russia strongly intends to achieve a rapid stabilisation of the situation in Syria through the rapid implementation of much-needed democratic reforms," the ministry said in a statement.
It comes after protesters attacked the Syrian embassy in London, breaking down barricades and hurling missiles at the building.
what do you think?

stuart walmsley
Doesn't Russia have a naval base in Syria ?

stevie may
Oh yeah ! And dont forget Syria buys its weapons from Russia and China

stevie may
The reason why Russia and China wont condemn Syria is for money - they know Syria buys their weapons and dont want to lose the revenue. That and the fact that Putin is a gangster.

jeanne
The world is not actually obliged to stand behind the USA and UK.....we have blood on our hands too.

tagliatellius
Notice how Libya is being ignored by our dear gobsmiths and media, seems like it is fine and dandy for Dave's islamic army to murder and torture civilians. And Hague's propaganda(lies) broadcasts to the "rebels" in Libya about Gaddafi using black African mercenaries has led to the deaths and disappearances of thousands of black Libyan.

barry
Steve Says The reason why Russia and China wont condemn Syria is for money - they know Syria buys their weapons and dont want to lose the revenue. That and the fact that Putin is a gangster (1) So Russia had as above their problem!! (2) China's main asset is "MADE IN CHINA" that sows up all Europe and the UK (3) Now the Premership bubble has burst, Russian Clubs have the wealth to attract the major players . (4) Finally the UN or Brussels along with the UK Government dont have either the Mussel or the Ed B.A.L.L.S to put the screws on either Russia or China especially China as to much lolly at stake.I think we should give them overseas aid as a bung like India whoops French Aircraft that didnt work either!!!!!

gypsy56
gengisken1227 - Remember Russia was the one who was suffering those -40 C temperatures, so had a genuine reason for 'temporarily' stopping the gas supplies for its own needs. Secondly, who are we to tell a legitimate government it cannot use whatever force it deems necessary to defend itself and its country from armed assault by terror groups. Would Cameron roll over and give in if Islamic fundamentalists took up arms and started shooting government employees and civilians in the towns and cities of the U.K.

jjg118
he is shelling civis u muppet. he is knows they will rip him appart for it so is usin his forces to show who is boss. a murderous bully. nothing else!

James Parr
how on earth can you defend any goverment murdering their own people

gypsy56
Remember the vast MAJORITY of Syrians have NOT taken to the streets to protest against the government. It is only OUR politically twisted 'free' press and the meglomaniac news moguls who deem it to be so !

gypsy56
It shouldn't be forgotten that some of the troops who derserted and went over to the armed rebels (sorry 'freedom fighters' were in fact armoured troops i.e. tank divisions. Why doesn't anyone consider that they would have no compunction shelling their own cities to bring in outside forces to lessen their casulties in their fight to overthrow a legitimate government. We only have their word that it is Assad's troops.

James Parr
How can we stand back and allow this murderous regime to continue -- we would have soon been involved internally if we had a stake in the countries natural assets -- however because we have no financial gain in syria we are content to watch innocent people murdered -- once again finance over human life is this goverments response

James Parr
This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.






ABritMum
5:30pm on 5/2/2012
The countries not backing this veto are the ones who have not bought into western capitalism because they don't have do and they can afford not to.
gengisken1227
7:33pm on 5/2/2012
Maybe, except China without the capitalist west to buy it's manufactures would still all be rural peasants, as would Russia without western capitalist customers to buy it's natural gas. The real rub is that europe is dependant on Russia for 25% of it's gas supplies who "temporarily" cut the gas supply during this -40c winter in central europe: just to show who has the whip hand.
Micky Lyden
12:01am on 6/2/2012
This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.