News In Depth

  • 19 April 2012, 9:52

Qatada deport appeal 'just in time'

Abu Qatada's appeal to European human rights judges against deportation to Jordan may have been lodged "just in time", according to advice from the Council of Europe.

Home Secretary Theresa May told MPs that the application by Qatada's lawyers should be thrown out by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) as the three-month deadline had passed when it was submitted on Tuesday night.

However, Labour released advice from the research department of the Council of Europe - which is responsible for the court - suggesting it may have just beaten the deadline.

The note, sent to the House of Commons Library, stresses that the final decision on whether the appeal is admissible now rests with a panel of five judges from the court's Grand Chamber.

"The Othman (Qatada) case was supposed to become final on 17/04/2012 and, according to the information provided by the European Court, the applicant requested a referral to the Grand Chamber on the 17/04," the note said.

"So I would say that it (is) just in time but of course the Court (panel) may decide otherwise."

The note was signed by Nathalie Chene of Secretariat of the Committee of Ministers Council of Europe.

Earlier, in the Commons, Mrs May was adamant that the appeal deadline had passed 24 hours earlier at midnight on Monday - April 16.

"The Government is clear that Abu Qatada has no right to refer the case to the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights, since the three-month deadline to do so lapsed at midnight on Monday," she said.

"The Government has written to the European Court to make clear our case that the application should be rejected because it is out of time."

On Tuesday, Mrs May announced Qatada had been rearrested and deportation proceedings resumed in the absence of any appeal against the court's ruling - issued on January 17 - that he would not face torture if he was deported to stand trial on terrorism charges in his native Jordan.

However that night at 11pm local time Qatada's lawyers lodged their appeal with the ECHR.

Amid noisy scenes in the Commons chamber, Mrs May accused the lawyers of using "delaying tactics" to hold up the deportation process.

She acknowledged, however, that proceedings would have to be put on hold while the Grand Chamber panel came to a decision on the admissibility of the appeal.

"They are the only final arbiters of what the deadline was," she said.

Pressed by Labour former home secretary Alan Johnson, she said that she took full responsibility for any error by the Government.

"I, of course, take responsibility for decisions that I have taken. This is not a question of what officials have done. I take full responsibility," she said.

Shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper said the "confusion" in the Home Office over the deadline date had played into the hand's of Qatada's lawyers, increasing the potential for delays and for Qatada to obtain bail.

She said that officials should have realised there could be a problem when journalists began querying the deadline date with them on Monday.

"When the Home Secretary is accused of not knowing what day of the week it is, chaos and confusion have turned into farce. But this farce has serious consequences," she said.

Among Tory MPs there was broad support for Mrs May coupled with frustration and anger at the prospect of further hold-ups at the hands of the ECHR.

Backbencher Charles Walker urged her to put the "scumbag and his murderous mates" on a plane out of the country and send "a metaphorical two fingers to the ECHR".

Outside the chamber, however, another Tory MP, Douglas Carswell, was scathing about the Government's handling of the case, saying it was "Carry on Sir Humphrey in the Home Office".

Campaigning in Scotland, David Cameron could not hide his exasperation at the latest setback.

"I sometimes wish I could put him on a plane and take him to Jordan myself. But Government has to act within the law. That is what we'll do. We will get this done," he said.

what do you think?

first 20 comments

nashy1964

9:49am on 19/4/2012

my gran used to say never trust a man with a beard as it hides his true intent and as they say always listen to your gran she knows best. i guess this guy is a perfect example of what gran says lol.

Score: 13

chris

10:02am on 19/4/2012

Strasbourg is/are not really concerned about our security situation, they are on a higher plane of ethics and process considerations. And an oppurtunity for Ms Cooper to add her Party's support to the effort to get rid of this prat. You can imagine at AQ meetings, as they pass the drinks around, them all having a great belly laugh at our procrastinations, hand wringing and navel gazing! We must appear so, so weak. What great encouragement to those who hate us.

Score: 7
2 replies

peter

10:14am on 19/4/2012

Lest not forget that Liebour signed up to the Convention in the first place, so Ms Cooper and her lot should zip it!

Score: 8

aa aa

4:33pm on 19/4/2012

Yes Peter. The European convention for human rights. Thanks for reminding us it took a labour government to sign up to this. The Tory party would have all and sundry thrown in the nearest prison, just because they objected to the unemployment figures. Throw away the key, if they go on strike. No one would have any rights under a Tory government, if they had their way.This one, is just a case of clever lawyers using the convention to avoid a just result. It doesn't mean the convention is responsible , or labour. You lot really do stoop very low, when your party is not looking good. You love to drag up history, and when you are challenged about your own lack of action, you whimper out some "liebour" excuse, or similar ridiculous spelling, Bliar etc etc.... so purile. Pathetic is a better word.

Score: 5

Name witheld

10:03am on 19/4/2012

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Brian E Gorton

10:05am on 19/4/2012

The ECHR is close to making a mockery of the Government !!! I think the English people and Abu Qatada think you are a load of wimps.Get him out now.

Score: 12

Ann Gree

10:07am on 19/4/2012

just kick him out end of....how much have the tax payers paid to keep him here under close watch...give me a kate I'll help on his way...

Score: 13

Brian E Gorton

10:26am on 19/4/2012

Why not do what King Solomon offered the two mothers.Send one section to whoever. If he is not totured,we can then send the other part. Problem solved. Everyones happy.

Score: 9

catherine traynor

10:31am on 19/4/2012

What's with us paying all the monies we pay in taxes - and then debate whether this animal will be tortured? Get rid of him - please! He does not deserve Human Rights.

Score: 9

altintoys

10:32am on 19/4/2012

Europeans--what a bunch of no-hopers. The British have bailed them out twice now. They didn't see what was coming before WW2, although it was staring them in the face and had been for 17 years. Apparently, they have gone mysteriously blind again!!!!!!!!!!

Score: 8

Windows Live User

11:12am on 19/4/2012

No delay Theresa. Put him on a plane tonight and put an end to it. S.. off to the european courts and late rubbish coming from do gooders. Jordan wants him so oblige them

Score: 9

Andy Ferris

1:55pm on 19/4/2012

Ms. Cooper should come down from the moral high ground. Like all MP's she just wants to get noticed... bless her cotton socks, doesn't she know that what she is doing is giving out mixed messages so England, yes I used the forbidden word England, looks stupid and totally silly. Are there any MP's that stand up for our good country? The sooner we move away from Europe the better. We export less to Europe than we do to some other countries so do we need them - a big fat NO! Send that man to his punishment. I for one do not want to pay for him and his family any more - just send him or shall we say 'export' him to where he needs to answer for his crimes.

Score: 7

chris mindyourownbusiness

1:57pm on 19/4/2012

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

amj67

2:04pm on 19/4/2012

israel would send in the mosad y cant we send in sas nobody would have to admit it

Score: 7

amj67

2:08pm on 19/4/2012

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Name witheld

2:25pm on 19/4/2012

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Score: 7

Tony

2:45pm on 19/4/2012

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Score: 1
1 reply

Name witheld

2:48pm on 19/4/2012

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Name witheld

2:46pm on 19/4/2012

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Fred McCann

3:05pm on 19/4/2012

Meanwhile we, while cutting back on the sick and the old, are paying for his defence. Time we shoved in a van and accidently dropped him at the Jordian Embassy. It is also time we did away with Legal Aid as such. Bring in a Public Defenders Office, and if they don't like the lawyer assigned to them, tough. Let them pay for one themselves.

Score: 6

Lionel Richard Smith

3:06pm on 19/4/2012

send him home , its the right thing to do . We don't want these people in our country ,have we not got plenty on our plate with out looking after people like him,I will tell you there's no smock without fire.

Score: 8

Robin Redman

3:17pm on 19/4/2012

I am all for human rights for those who need it to protect them but cases like this make a mockery of it. If a person is found guilty of grime under english law or is consider undersireable they should be deported immediatly other countries do it why cant we

Score: 6

Name witheld

5:46pm on 19/4/2012

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Advertisement