UK & World News
MoD Overspends Equipment Budget By £6.5bn
The Ministry of Defence has overspent its equipment budget by £6.5bn and some of its major orders are likely to be delivered 39 years late.
The 16 most costly projects should have taken 159 years to deliver between them and cost a total of £56.5bn.
But the National Audit Office (NAO), in its latest report into the MoD's spending, reveals they are now set to take a total of 195 years and cost £61.1bn.
The report did find some improvement, with the overspend "only" £468m.
Most of that is due to the rising cost of fuel, although NAO report author Tim Banfield said the defence buyers could do better.
He said: "What we see is too much turbulence in the projects, there's too much change, so if you look at the 16 projects this year that we are covering, 14 of them have got some change in cost or timescales in the last year.
"If you are the MoD trying to budget well, getting that kind of uncertainty and movement makes it very difficult to plan in the long term."
Defence Secretary Philip Hammond said the huge "blackhole" is a legacy of the MoD ordering during the last Labour government.
He described a "conspiracy of optimism" between the MoD and contractors in the past and is adamant the current plans are "fully funded".
Mr Hammond likens balancing the defence budget to "turning round a supertanker".
"These are huge projects often delivered over periods of five, 10 even 15 years, often they've got legacies of poor management and financial control and getting this straight is a big task, but it's happening," he said.
The real big ticket items include £17bn for more Typhoon fighter jets, £12bn for transport aircraft, including refuelling tankers and £5.3bn for the two new Queen Elizabeth Class aircraft carriers.
The NAO says that delivery delays in air refuelling aircraft means there are likely to be too few to go around in the next three years.
However, Mr Hammond has said he was already taking steps to prolong the life of the current air tankers by another six months to plug the gap.
The NAO has acknowledged that the lead time for some of these projects is so great and the costs difficult to accurately assess, but nevertheless thinks the MoD could get better at it.
It cites one smaller project for a communications system designed for troops in Afghanistan, which costs £32m but will not be ready until all UK forces are back home.
what do you think?
So if the communication system is not ready on time then surely theres no obligation to pay for it?? If u was having an extension built and it was so late that you'd emigrated before it was finished !! The builder would not get paid. But th MOD who at one point was paying £23 for a bulb that cost pence well lets just say they're very gullible financially
Depends how contract reads
This is not new as the procurement people themselves lack commercial understanding. The tax payer is a victim but worst of all so are those who need the equipment - our armed forces.
This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.