UK & World News
More Foreign Offenders Dodging Deportation

Nearly 4,000 foreign criminals who should have been deported remain on the streets of Britain and a further 1,600 are still in UK detention despite finishing their sentences, inspectors say.
Chief inspector of the UK Border Agency (UKBA) John Vine said the number of foreign offenders who have not been kicked out has increased and he blames the interpretation of human rights rules.
"More must be done to actively manage these cases - they represent a growing cost to the taxpayer and cannot be ignored," he said.
He called on the agency to reduce the number of decisions overturned and said endless cycles of appeals are a waste of public money.
His intervention follows Home Secretary Theresa May's attack on human rights laws earlier this month. She said judges should not consider the right to a family life to be "absolute".
Mr Vine found 3,775 former prisoners who should have been told to leave the country were still living in the community.
Another 1,600 had completed their jail terms but were still being detained. He found 12 people were missing.
The chief inspector said there was a significant difference in the way the UKBA and the legal system interpreted the rules, with just 151 offenders being allowed to stay on their first attempt and 425 people having their rejection overturned by the courts.
The "overwhelming majority" of these appeals were on human rights grounds, he added.
Between 2007 and 2010, 20,360 foreign national prisoners were deported from the UK, 5,235 of them in 2010.
Immigration Minister Damian Green said: "This Government is tackling the problems of the past - we are starting the deportation process earlier and removing foreign criminals quicker than ever.
"Where a foreign criminal poses a risk to the public, we believe they should stay in detention.
"Foreign criminals in the community awaiting deportation will be subject to stringent reporting restrictions while every effort is made to remove them from the country."
He added: "For too long Article 8 has been used to place the family rights of foreign criminals above the rights of the British public, which is why we will change the immigration rules to ensure a better balance."
The Home Secretary's decision to use her speech to the Conservative party conference to criticise human rights laws was over-shadowed when she used an example of a man being granted leave to remain "because he had a pet cat".
Kenneth Clarke, the Justice Secretary, called his Cabinet colleague's remarks "laughable" but later said he regretted using "colourful language".
what do you think?

Mac Tont
Far too much time and taxpayers money has been spent on so-called human rights. The Government should stop playing around with this legislation and get on with the job of deporting all of these undesirables. Interpretation of the law needs a top-down reassessment.

fleur black
solicitors actually have to uphold the law so if the law lets them take juicy criminal cases then they will do so... the human rights act needs rewriting concerning foreign criminals rights.

Mike McDonough
Just kick them out and let them complain about their human rights from wherever they land.They'll soon give up when they find that they will not be financed to pursue their claims.UK is the only country that panders to these criminals and illegals.

Christopher Hodson
The logical thinking beats me. If an immigrant is legally entitled to reside in the UK then he has every righht to stay. What are you going to do then when it is an English born person commits a crime for which he spends time in prison. Are you now saying that when he has served his time he or she is bannished from the United Kingdom? Of course not so why should these racist bigots think that someone who has emmigrated and been acepted to stay in this country and have their family residing in this country should they be deported. Each case is different but for the UKBA who have already been labeled not fit for purpose by the select commitee of MP's make a comment is laughable as they are on bonus to remove people.

sam_temple
I have to disagree on this one I'm sorry but it should be part of any agreement that if we let you live in our country part of the condition that you stay on the right side of the law or we have the right to deport you and your dependents back to your country of origin.








Christopher Hayton
10:45am on 27/10/2011
This isn't just the human rights legislation - although that is a sham in many respects. The main problem lies with shiester lawyers and weak judiciary. They CAN and should balance the human rights of victims and the general public and order deportation should they so wish. There needs to be a root and branch clear-out of judges etc. and a new recruitment drive from more 'ordinary' in-touch people. I would like to volunteer as first.