UK & World News

  • 1 February 2013, 7:43

Mother Jailed After Baby Killed By Falling TV

A woman who killed her baby son when she knocked a television on his head while high on drink and drugs has been jailed for 15 months.

Natalie McMillan, 25, put her "self-indulgent drugs lifestyle" ahead of the welfare of her son Kian, who died from "catastrophic injuries", Preston Recorder Judge Anthony Russell QC said.

The baby boy was lying on his changing mat at the family home in Burnley, Lancashire, when his mother attempted to move the TV to plug in a scart lead and watch a DVD.

While giving evidence at her trial at Preston Crown Court, she tried to blame Kian's father - her ex-partner Edward Hanratty, 41 - and said she was upstairs in bed at the time.

McMillan denied she had been under the influence of drugs when her son died, but tests later showed she had taken heroin and valium.

Hanratty had also taken drink and drugs, and had passed out on the kitchen floor at their address on December 6, 2011.

Both pleaded guilty to child cruelty on the basis of neglect during their trial last month.

McMillan was cleared of manslaughter by gross negligence, but Judge Russell said he was satisfied it was she who actually moved the television through "foolishness".

Hanratty failed to attend for his sentencing and a warrant for his arrest has been issued.

Sentencing McMillan, the judge said: "Over the short life of your child it is apparent that both you and your partner gave priority to your selfish and self-indulgent drugs lifestyle and neglected the welfare of Kian.

"On the night he died, both of you were so intoxicated by drugs and alcohol that you probably forgot all about him with the tragic consequence that he died."

He added that it was clear McMillan had been concealing the extent of her drug addiction from social services and health teams for a long time.

She had also hidden her relationship with Hanratty, who was known to social services for previous welfare issues with other children.

Peter Wright QC, defending, said McMillan had made "considerable improvement" since descending to the "depths of the spiral of drink and drugs".

He added: "This is a young woman who is emotionally detached. This emotional detachment may be long term by reason of her own life by what occurred in infancy and subsequently in adolescence."

Detective Inspector Mark Rothwell from Lancashire Police said: "This is a tragic case in which a four-month-old baby has lost his life in the most tragic of circumstances.

"Natalie McMillan was in no fit state to look after Kian that night, and this should serve as a warning to people and highlight the most serious of consequences of caring for children, especially young babies, whilst under the influence of drink and drugs.

"From the moment Natalie McMillan dialled 999, to her sentencing, she has shown absolutely no remorse and will now have a period in custody to reflect on her actions and the impact that drugs have had on her life."

what do you think?

13 comments

shaun spencer

4:43pm on 31/1/2013

Drugs and booze and babies dont mix.social services should have had this baby away from this couple at birth.until the mother was off the stuff for a least a year.same goes for any drugged up parents.

Score: 18
4 replies

Diane Rogers

5:33pm on 31/1/2013

Totally agree. Poor little thing

Score: 13

Andrea Hill

5:43pm on 31/1/2013

agree , why are druggie parents allowed to keep their kids.

Score: 13

Andrea Hill

10:17pm on 31/1/2013

who the heck is giving.thumbs down, u mad?

Score: 7

Louisa Gieldon

2:56pm on 1/2/2013

Andrea though i didnt mark you up or down i can understand why people do - maybe they don't like the word "druggies", Maybe they don't agree that all addicts should have all children removed from the family home. I worked wth many addicted parents and many were good parents who managed their drug use with the help of a non addicted partner. I don't agree that al addicts should keep their children but i certainly don't agree with a blanket rule that they should be removed

Score: 1

Saw Jig

4:44pm on 31/1/2013

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Saw Jig

4:44pm on 31/1/2013

End of *

Score: 3
1 reply

Andrea Hill

10:17pm on 31/1/2013

end of ??!!

Score: 3

Nat_j2b

6:02pm on 31/1/2013

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Score: 7
1 reply

Andrea Hill

7:27pm on 31/1/2013

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Score: 2

movvi

6:34pm on 31/1/2013

The line, "you probably forgot all about him" is hard to stomach. Poor little boy. Who knows what sort of a life he would have had? The damage done in the womb to the children of drug addicts is often severe and life-altering and clearly, this pair was hardly able to look after him properly. Reading this story, I can't help but wonder if he might now be out of his misery. What bright spark thinks it's a good idea to repeatedly bring children into messes like these? I am genuinely incensed.

Score: 16
1 reply

Louisa Gieldon

2:52pm on 1/2/2013

It is horrible. Very sad indeed.

Score: 1

david

6:50pm on 31/1/2013

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Score: 15
1 reply

Andrea Hill

7:29pm on 31/1/2013

they get more benefits than oaps who have worked all.their lives, things need to change!!!

Score: 8

Chris Carr

6:54pm on 31/1/2013

Some people should not be allowed to breed. At the very least this poor little mite hsould have been placed in foster care the day he was born. When will social workers ever get it right?

Score: 13
2 replies

john byrne

9:57am on 1/2/2013

Chris, the social workers get it right in the 1000s of cases you dont read about in the news. Im not a social worker, but havign seen the stuff they have to deal with from with in their own departments and the people they have to deal with, I for one would not be so quick to blame them.

Score: 4

Louisa Gieldon

2:51pm on 1/2/2013

Agreed John. I have still have several friends who are social workers though i have retired now. Working in children and families is gruelling and they get no praise when cases are handled well and have good outcomes, as many thousands do. Working with people who have a thousand tricks up their sleeves to decieve their social wokers is very stressful. I actually agree that not enough children are removed quickly enough from homes where the sole or both carers are addicted. But think of all the stories concerned with villifying sws who have removed children and the papers then run very one sided stories about the "wronged" parents, People need to start looking behind the headlines.

Score: 2

Name witheld

7:11pm on 31/1/2013

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Score: 12
1 reply

Diane Rogers

8:20pm on 31/1/2013

I have said something similar only a deserted island food and water nothing else

Score: 7

Helen Little

8:11pm on 31/1/2013

People who put themselves before their children should be sterilised at birth.She probably didn't even know where she was when he was conceived

Score: 12

Nat_j2b

7:18am on 1/2/2013

Orange,stop removing my perfectly normal comments!! If u don't like people having an opinion then do not allow comments to be made! As I was saying... This woman should never have been allowed to keep this child. Disgusting drug addicts don't deserve to keep a baby. I wouldn't even trust them with a dog. Where on earth were the social services??

Score: 5

ali baba

9:00am on 1/2/2013

This would not happen if the government stopped being so generous with income support. Plasma tv and all the mod cons and your meant to be outra work? People like this would think twice about having kids if the government stopped being so generous. Fact.

Score: 6

jones.emyr

12:14pm on 1/2/2013

15 months isnt a long time at all. She should have her womb and ovaries removed upon release so that she cant have any more kids. She cetainly doesnt deserve any.

Score: 5
1 reply

Name witheld

9:09am on 2/2/2013

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Name witheld

6:02pm on 1/2/2013

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Score: 5
Advertisement