Financial News

  • 22 November 2011, 5:35

First-Time Buyer Plan 'May Allow 5% Deposits'

Taxpayers could underwrite millions of pounds worth of mortgages for first-time buyers as part of a plan that may allow deposits to be cut to as little as 5%.

The Government is aiming to "unblock" the housing market and would target people who are currently priced out of getting a foot on the property ladder.

According to The Independent, having the taxpayer underwrite some mortgages would allow deposits for first-time buyers to fall from the current level of 20%.

It comes as the Government unveils a series of proposals designed to tackle a shortage of affordable homes.

Housing minister Grant Shapps confirmed to Sky News there would be a government-backed indemnity scheme.

"People have had to wait until they are perhaps 37 to get a foot on the housing ladder and save up the equivalent of a year's income after tax," he said.

"This scheme brings the industry together, the lenders with the builders, and allows the Government to do that extra little bit to get them across the finishing line in order to ensure people will be able to put down smaller deposits."

Mr Shapps said the money came from budget "underspends" and was not extra cash.

He earlier remarked to the BBC: "What we want to do is make it easier for first-time buyers... who say the biggest problem we have is the amount of deposit that we have to get together - that is their biggest blockage."

Asked about the potential financial pitfalls for the taxpayer, Mr Shapps said public money would not be put at "unreasonable risk".

He added: "The industry itself - the Council of Mortgage Lenders, the homebuilders - they've been working on these types of ideas for a very long time, many, many months, and are actually trying to help themselves.

"What Government can do, of course, is sometimes provide some sort of backstop but actually this is largely going to be an industry-led approach with support from the Government."

He said the money would be "recycled" - it would help developers or first-time buyers before coming back to the public purse to be "used again for something else".

The coalition has also published details of a £400m Get Britain Building scheme, which will aim to help projects put on hold due to a lack of funding.

The Government claims the money will "unlock" the construction of up to 16,000 new homes, supporting 32,000 jobs in the process.

It is estimated that around 3,200 of the properties will be affordable homes.

In the foreword to the Laying The Foundations report, the Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister explain: "The housing market is one of the biggest victims of the credit crunch: lenders won't lend, so builders can't build and buyers can't buy."

"That lack of confidence is visible in derelict building sites and endless For Sale signs," David Cameron and Nick Clegg write.

"It is doing huge damage to our economy and our society, so it is right for Government to step in and take bold action to unblock the market."

However, the opposition say the new money is an inadequate replacement for funding for similar projects cut by the coalition.

Shadow housing minister Jack Dromey said: "George Osborne is giving back only 10% of last year's £4bn cut to housing investment to build just 3,200 affordable homes.

"With millions in need of a decent home at a price they can afford, the country is gripped by a growing housing crisis.

"Despite 127 government announcements, more than one a week since the coalition took power, their own figures show a 6% fall in new homes and a 10% increase in homelessness.

"Their housing policies are failing and George Osborne's mismanagement of the economy is making things worse, holding back housebuilding."

:: It comes as the Rightmove House Price Index suggests there has been a 13% fall in the number of new sellers coming to the market, compared with the previous month.

It blames the uncertainty over the future of the eurozone.

Asking prices have also fallen by more than 3% (3.1% ) in a month.

what do you think?

first 20 comments

wayne elson

6:35am on 21/11/2011

Housing shortage? Would not be if we did not keep giving free flats and houses to to the mass influx of freeloaders entering this country,stop freeloaders coming in stop housing shortage and the extra strain on resources ,in our 2nd world country

Score: 6

Name witheld

7:38am on 21/11/2011

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Score: 2

Name witheld

7:44am on 21/11/2011

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Score: 4

Peter Edwardson

8:51am on 21/11/2011

Solve the immigration problem don't destroy the countryside.

Score: 3

gengisken1227

8:53am on 21/11/2011

So tax payers via the government will become mortgage lenders or rather the guarantors of mortgages to other tax payers who cannot afford a mortgage - seems like a great idea, wasn't this tried in america and led to the sub-prime debacle !!!!!!! What a bunch of plonkers

Score: 4

ben turpin

8:57am on 21/11/2011

we need more houses but also the system should be changed british born people should be first in line no matter age or gender, and single girls with kids should automatically get priority !! maybe then they wouldnt be so keen to have unprotected sex, and if the masssive migration might start to slow down if they knew they would have to sleep in a box under london bridge. no address no benefits either.

Score: 4

Christopher Hayton

9:01am on 21/11/2011

Wayne - second world? You are an optomistic soul aren't you?

Score: 2

Stuart Harley

9:27am on 21/11/2011

stop housing benefit !!!

Score: 3

Grim Reaper

9:33am on 21/11/2011

Yes this is great. Let's lend to people who cannot repay. Let's create more sub prime debt and have another banking crisis. The age of home ownership as such may be coming to an end and the age of renting could be upon us.

Score: 2

Stuart Harley

9:48am on 21/11/2011

I SAID STOP HOUSING BENEFIT.... think about it !!!

Score: 3

tagliatellius

10:08am on 21/11/2011

Don't blame immigrants, it is the politicians who allow them in to keep down wages. Councils used to have their own building workers and built their own council housing, Thatcher stopped that and threw the British people to the mercy of free enterprise. The country has been going downhill ever since, the only winners are the super rich. The politicians are our only enemy.

Score: 4

Louise Smith

11:55am on 21/11/2011

This was tried in the USA and failed. As a pensioner and home owner who struggled to pay my mortgage I feel others should do so too. STOP HOUSING BENEFITS. It encourages people to be lazy and rely on others.

Score: 2

Louise Smith

11:56am on 21/11/2011

Sarah Lee.... The money went the same way that all the Gold reserve money went!!!!!! Squandered and sold at the wrong time.

Name witheld

1:56pm on 21/11/2011

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Score: 1

Tina Nunn

3:28pm on 21/11/2011

I think the problems started when council houses were sold off in the 80s under Thatcher. The council had so much money from this. Where did that all go?? They should have built more council houses then there wouldn't be the long wait for them, which would mean less people trying to buy. I don;t know what my boys are going to do. My youngest is in his last year of college, can't even get a sat job, let alone full time when he finishes next year.

Score: 1
1 reply

tagliatellius

6:56pm on 21/11/2011

Thatcher wouldn't let them use the money for new housing stock, she wanted a compliant workforce chained to a mortgage and debt, a bit like slavery really.

armstrongalan

4:09pm on 21/11/2011

Isn't this where all the rot started out in the USA? Lending money on 'sub-prime' mortgages to people who didn't have the wherewithall to get into the market as it stood. And they defaulted!!! When will politicians ever learn? It was too much debt that got us into the trouble in the first place.

Score: 2

gypsy56

6:02pm on 21/11/2011

Houses are overpriced by at least 50% in this neck of the woods (Hampshire) with the local councils not having built a single persons dweliing for over 7 years, they've all been 3,4,5 and 6 bedroomed houses. The only single bedroomed places they've built have been earmarked for the elderly to get them to move out of their previous family homes. The young have nowhere to go. There was a 4 bedroom property up for rent last week £1798 a month.

Score: 1

tagliatellius

7:02pm on 21/11/2011

Same up my neck of the woods, idiot councillors want to fill up up the little remaining green belt land with "executive" housing to attract "high fliers" to the area, an area with less and less work thanks to the fools in Parliament. I used to do a bit of work in the local exclusive luxury housing area, full of thieves and footballers it was.

Score: 1

Jonathan Goodwin-Self

7:02pm on 21/11/2011

So the standard taxpayer who bailed out RBS, Lloyds and Northern Rock to nearly 1 trillion pounds will now have to bail out millionaires who can buy a house for nothing or to the poor who will get a mortgage and after 2 years will leave the house. This new thing was tried in the USA and was also done by Northern Rock and both cases collapsed and debts were enormouse.

Score: 2

george clement

7:36pm on 21/11/2011

So what's new. We bought our house when we got married in 1965 and the deposit required was 10% but I asked the local council who I got the mortgage from if I could just put down 5% and they allowed it. The interest rate was 6% and was fixed. If the government sorted the estate agents and mortgage lenders where housing prices were standardised and mortgages fitted to these prices instead of overvaluing properties to get bigger comissions and falsifying peoples earnings to pay for inflated house price mortgages which in turn yields higher comissions the kids of today would have a better chance on the propetry ladder.

Score: 3
Advertisement