UK & World News
NHS Will Remove Private PIP Breast Implants
Women will be allowed to have their PIP breast implants removed on the NHS - even if the original procedure was done privately.
The Government says the surgery will be offered free of charge to NHS patients, and expects private firms to offer the same deal to their clients.
Any woman denied help by a private clinic would be able to have her implants removed on the health service, the Department of Health said.
The move comes after a Government review amid fears the implants could rupture.
The investigation, conducted by experts, said it was "undeniably the case" they were made of non-medical grade silicone, but was unable to establish if the rupture rate with PIP implants was higher than others.
The experts said they could not entirely rule out that some were toxic - but they concluded there was no evidence to suggest routine removal was necessary.
The group said there was no link between the implants and cancer, as reported in one French case.
In France, the government has told 30,000 women they should have the implants removed while the Czech and German authorities have recommended that women should also have them taken out.
A 2005 report by a consultant plastic surgeon in Los Angeles warned that PIP implants were three-and-a-half times more likely to rupture than a test group.
Around 40,000 women in the UK received the implants, manufactured by now-closed French company Poly Implant Prostheses (PIP).
The Government said those patients who had their implants on the NHS as part of breast reconstruction surgery - believed to be around 5% of the total - will be able to have them removed and replaced if they are concerned.
All women who have received an implant on the health service will be contacted and offered a consultation with their GP or their original surgical team.
They could be offered scans to see if there is any evidence that their implant has ruptured.
With the support of their doctor, women who still have concerns will be able to have them removed and replaced free of charge on the NHS.
The Government expects private firms to make the same offer to anxious women who paid for their implants privately and also wish to have them taken out.
And ministers intend to pursue private clinics to avoid the taxpayer picking up the bill.
The Department of Health said: "Private providers have legal obligations to their patients. The NHS will offer a package of care for its patients, and we expect the private sector to do the same."
If the private clinic that provided PIP implants has closed down, the NHS will pay for removing the implants if the patient is entitled to NHS care.
But it will not pay for replacements in these patients.
Some private firms have already come forward to say they will offer women free removal of their implants.
Health Secretary Andrew Lansley, who ordered the review, said: "We think there is a standard of care that should be provided to women.
"They should have information about what implant they have, that they should get access through a GP or a specialist to advice, imaging scans if necessary, and on the basis of that if necessary their removal."
The Association of Breast Surgery, British Association of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons, British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Federation of Surgical Speciality Associations and the Royal College of Surgeons welcomed the Government's announcement.
In a joint statement they said: "Surgeons' organisations applaud those private cosmetic clinics who have committed to offer treatment to their patients free of charge and fully back the Government call for the rest to follow suit."
what do you think?

Mike
The government is absolutely right on this (and you wont catch me saying that too often). If women had implants for medical reasons on the NHS then absolutely the NHS must bear the cost. If however for reasons of vanity they had cosmetic enhancements done privately let them sort it out themselves ( with government support in chasing the private companies / surgeons who have been making money from the practice).

Peter Edwardson
Does anyone have any idea why the Media (TV in particular) are campaigning so vigorously to get us to pay for the private medical companies mistake?

William Wallace
I understand that the women who have these implants are upset and concerned about their health. Maybe they should have thought about this prior to having the procedure. I understand that some are carried out for health/well being issues but the majority is through vanity! Why does the Government and subsequently the tax payer have to bail them out! The Government and the people did not make them go and have the operation. This may upset some people and I do apologise.

grahammcneill2
so all the vain women who had this done will now be denying people who are really ill treatment because of there selfish vanity i am really angry about this i am waiting on an urgent eye operation wehich now it looks i will be waiting even longer WHY CANT YOU BE THANKFUL WITH WHAT YOU HAVE
Name witheld
This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

j.r.haynes
I agree with the main theme so far, that the NHS should not pay to repair the botched private damage inflicted by greedy practitioners. I strongly feel that in the current climate of reviews on spending, evaluating what we can each afford and trimming bidgets accordingly, I'd go as far as to say ANY self-inflicted damage should not be funded by the NHS. This would include illness arising from smoking, excessive drinking and obesity. With finite budgets, spending should be on the most deserving, not the greedy and vain.

Sandra Hamilton
But where would you stop the restrictions? No treatment for skin cancer if you've used a sunbed or sunbathed in a hot country? No treatment for sport related injuries? No treatment for driving related injuries (it's your choice to drive)? No treatment for pregnancy, after all that's also a personal choice?

Raymond Castle
If women wanted these blooming things done because of vanity then they should pay to have them taken out, however if they were put in because of medical reasons then that is different.

Helena Carter
I totally agree with mike and the others that why should people who are awaiting operations be put back yet again for some womens vanity. If they paid to have the implants in the first place ,surely who they paid should be responsible for any replacements not the NHS. I agree with the NHS removing them FOC (free of charge) if this is what the women need or require but not to paying for the replacement.

David Wragg
I agree with Helena - the only people who should have the replacements under the NHS should be those who had reconstructive surgery after surgery for cancer.

Baker101
So who wants to organise a protest then?

Jan N Andy Oakley-Hills
This is self-inflicted by their own vanity, and I am totally opposed to the private cosmetic patients having any treatment for this on the NHS, they should pay privately and sue the clinics for re-imbursement. Any treatment on the NHS should be only for women who have had reconstructive surgery for cancer etc. anything else will be taking the money away from people who are desperately waiting surgery and will cause them even longer wait in pain and anxiety.

Urszula Sarzala
True, well said.

sales
most nhs patients are for medical reasons, private implants are 99% cosmetic . why should the tax payer fit the bill for this, at the end of the day the goods are faulty . . think I might take the broken tv i bought from currys and swap it for the one out of my local hospilal waiting room if they are now providing a universal warranty !

Richard Hutchings
I agree with most of the comments so far , why the hell should the NHS foot the bill for these vain women. the only women entitled to have them removed at my (and yours) expense are those who had reconstructive surgery. Does the government not realise that saying they will foot the bill if private firms do not carry out the removal will only mean they will all refuse to remove them in order not to dent their profits. and we the poor old taxpayer will once again have to bail someone out, do these women also expect us to pay to have replacements fitted - again in my opinion only those requiring reconstrutive surgery are entitled.

Fred McCann
This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Fred McCann
Why? I can understand if it was medical reasons, but anything else, no.

Roger Siviter
Sandra Hamilton, it's no good arguing against common sense restrictions...... It's all gone t*ts up!

Gayle Harrison
I'm more than happy for my hard earned NI to go towards removals for the poor women who have had to have reconstructive surgery, etc. I'll be buggered if I'm going to pay for the vain ones!!! Really annoyed about this, but I had a feeling that the Government would go down this road!

derekhuddy2
What a complete and utter joke. People are put on waiting lists and have to wait until they're half dead to get there but anyone who wants vanity surgery can jump straight in. This country has gone utterly bonkers. If you want a sex change just go the doctors and cry. If you have small b****** just go the doctors and cry. My brother has natural kidney infections and they are giving up on him but he has to wait until he has 15% function in them before he goes on a transplant list. My sister in law has a heart problem but she has to wait until the problem is fatal before they operate. She might be too old to live through an operation like this when she is ready. Cameron wants to stop trying to be famous and do something moral for once.

Louise Smith
The Government are correct. I am a tax payer and do not want to pay for women to have these removed. The only exception would be for women who have had to have a reconstruction operation due to illness and not for vain women who wanted larger body parts. I think my opeinion is echoed by many people.

Gavin Nellis
So who made the booboo? lol






Mike Drouin
10:13am on 7/1/2012
i dont see why i should pay when these women went private and especisly so if it were for vanity ,which is normaly so .