UK & World News
North Korea Rapped Over Rocket Launch
North Korea has been widely condemned by the international community after launching a long-range rocket.
The blast-off, which had been anticipated, has been viewed with suspicion by critics who believe the country was carrying out a ballistic missile test under cover.
The impoverished state has said it was simply delivering a weather satellite to space and it declared the mission a success.
Experts have said it may take time to confirm that any North Korean satellite is orbiting Earth, but the launch is set to strain tensions in the region.
It tried in April to launch a long-range rocket, but it broke apart shortly after lift-off, crash-landing in the Yellow Sea.
South Korea said the latest attempt - the second under leader Kim Jong-Un - appeared to have broken up in three stages as planned.
South Korea, which is days away from presidential elections, has expressed "grave concern" and its president Lee Myung-Bak immediately called an emergency security meeting, while the UN Security Council is also holding talks.
The White House called it a "highly provocative act that threatens regional security", and China also expressed concern.
British Foreign Secretary William Hague strongly condemned the launch, saying it was a "clear violation" of UN Security Council resolutions.
He said: "I deplore the fact that the DPRK (Democratic People's Republic of Korea) has chosen to prioritise this launch over improving the livelihood of its people."
The rocket was launched shortly before 1am UK time on Wednesday from a site on the northwest coast. Japan's government said it had passed over Okinawa - a trajectory predicted by the North.
Pyongyang announced earlier this month the launch would take place by December 21, later extending the deadline to December 29.
The country is banned from conducting missile and nuclear-related tests under UN sanctions imposed after its 2006 and 2009 nuclear tests.
It is thought to have a handful of rudimentary nuclear bombs, but it is not yet believed to be capable of building warheads small enough to pin on a long-range missile.
Japan, which had been on high alert since the launch window opened, did not try to shoot down the latest rocket, its government said. Tokyo said it believed debris from the rocket had fallen into the sea off the Korean peninsula and the Philippines.
A spokesman for Japan's government called the launch "extremely regrettable", adding: "Our country cannot tolerate this. We strongly protest to North Korea."
American space expert Jonathan McDowell, of the Harvard-Smithsonian Centre for Astrophysics, believes the Unha-3 rocket has indeed delivered a satellite to space.
"Clearly this is much more successful than their last attempt. It's at least as good as they've ever done. They've proved the basic design of it."
Update:
Hello, regular commenting on Orange News and Sport pages closes on Thursday 30 May 2013. We will continue to provide a commenting facility on major news and sport events on orangeworld.co.uk. Contact us via http://oran.ge/OWfeedback if you have any further questions. Thanks.
what do you think?

Sam Jones
But when china and america shoot rockets into space to brg down there own satelites to show each other there capable of doing so no one makes a fuss, im not condoning north koreas actions but it just makes me laugh that the only country to ever use an atomic bomb out of anger are the ones tellin these countrys they cant own wepons alike.

chris
The Allies were the first to use it. 'Others' would have liked to have used it first. 'Others' would also have liked a different outcome of WW2. A great many people out there would like a 'realignment' of the current world order and the means to achieve it. When China is the world's no 1 superpower (economically) how will our world change? Will Islam rise or destroy itself?

Nigel L
While their people live in fear and abject poverty





stevie may
9:44am on 12/12/2012
Democratic peoples republic? That's a laugh. It dosent matter wether its Korea or some Congolese militia - how come organisations that actually use the word democratic in their title, or the word 'peoples', are always the least democratic?!
chris
10:09am on 12/12/2012
I suppose that there are agreed rules in this 'sham' game. Any regime that use titles that include such words is just letting you know that they ain't playing by your rules! ' Socialist' is another - anything but! Any country that feels the need to refer to itself as a 'Republic' is also tarred by association. Is it an expression/desire for fierce independance after feeling years of lack of due recognition? The Scots can/will certainly play the fierce bit.