Financial News

  • 13 February 2012, 10:48

Protests Spread Over New Anti-Piracy Laws

Protesters in Britain and Europe have braved bitterly cold conditions to protest against implementation of EU-wide anti-piracy legislation.

According to activists a crowd of several hundred gathered outside the British Music House near London's Oxford Circus, with dozens of protests elsewhere across the eurozone.

The demonstrators voiced their opposition to the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (Acta), which seeks to establish international protection of intellectual property (IP).

Website designer Jon Worth, 31, told Sky News Online: "It was negotiated in secret without adequate parliamentary scrutiny.

"It is very important that the matter of digital rights is taken more seriously. In a number of European countries it is higher up the agenda than it is here."

IP protection is seen by technologically advanced nations as a way to thwart copyright piracy in sectors such as fashion, entertainment, pharmaceuticals and computer software.

The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development believes IP infringements cost the global economy $250bn (£160bn) per year.

But opponents see the legislation restricting internet freedoms, with possible closure of websites without court orders.

"The difficulty we face is that the text has been agreed so protest is late in the day," Mr Worth, who is active in Labour party, said.

Britain's Intellectual Property Office said in a statement: "Acta is not about how people use the internet in their everyday lives. It is not the intention of Acta to restrict freedom of the internet and it will not censor websites."

The Metropolitan Police told Sky News Online that the London protest took place without any arrests being made.

The Acta agreement, negotiated between the EU, Australia, Japan, Canada, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, South Korea, Switzerland, Singapore and the United States, needs all 27 EU countries to ratify the deal.

But on Friday Germany halted signing the controversial accord, saying it needed more time to consider it, while Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovakia have frozen their ratification process.

"There has been mounting protests in the last few weeks, so we hope Acta will not enter into force," Mr Worth said.

"Politicians need to pay more attention to the issue of digital rights."

The recent arrest in New Zealand of several people behind the Megaupload file-sharing service, done at the request of the FBI, has been seen by some critics as spreading IP protection power.

In December and January the US department of justice and FBI also closed down hundreds of China-based websites selling replica sporting apparel and designer handbags.

Proposed US introduction of the Stop Online Piracy Act (Sopa) has also caused widespread opposition, with thousands of websites including Wikipedia and Google raising concerns.

Hacktivists have also claimed attacks on official websites, such as record companies and trade associations, they see as supporting Sopa and Acta.

what do you think?

8 comments

gypsy56

10:28pm on 11/2/2012

Sledgehammer and nut spring to mind.. Every sucessfull well known band has done cover songs under this law they would have been classed as criminals for breaching copyright. Any unknown band releasing a cover song on the internet looking to get more fans - guilty of copyright. Once again only the lawyers will win!

Score: 1

Name witheld

10:50pm on 11/2/2012

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Score: 5

Princess Angelique

12:02am on 12/2/2012

Seeing as they mentioned it, I don't see the problem with selling replica handbags, etc.. Replicas are only bought by those who can't afford the real thing; and people who can afford the real thing would never dream of buying replicas, so nobody really loses - it's a win-win really!

Stuart Harley

1:06am on 12/2/2012

If I buy a painting IT IS MINE.If i buy a house IT IS MINE.If I buy a car IT IS MINE.If I buy a coat IT IS MINE.If I buy a TV IT IS MINE.If I buy a boxof chocolates IT IS MINE...If I buy a CD player IT IS MINE,If I buy a computer IT IS MINE SO WHY cant I own music on a CD or a computer program on a CD when I HAVE TO BUY THEM AS WELL????If I buy anything ,in my mind it is MINE TO DO WITH AS I WISH.......This is ONLY ABOUT PROFITEERING AND GREED and NOTHING ELSE

Score: 1

eqinox187

9:19am on 12/2/2012

"This country is DEAD 10:50 PM on 11/2/2012 If I buy a painting IT IS MINE.If i buy a house IT IS MINE.If I buy a car IT IS MINE.If I buy a coat IT IS MINE.If I buy a TV IT IS MINE.If I buy a boxof chocolates IT IS MINE...If I buy a CD player IT IS MINE,If I buy a computer IT IS MINE SO WHY cant I own music on a CD or a computer program on a CD when I HAVE TO BUY THEM AS WELL????If I buy anything ,in my mind it is MINE TO DO WITH AS I WISH.......This is ONLY ABOUT PROFITEERING AND GREED and NOTHING ELSE" ...... I'm not sure if you understand what this law effects as it wont effect content or items that are purchased legally only those that are illeagle. Regardles of what you believe the fact is by purchasing a music CD or a DVD / BluRay you automatically agree to the terms of use same as when you install a game or a peace of software you have to agree to a terms of use agreement before it will install and a big part of this agreement is not being able to copy or distribute copy's the only exception to this is music and the ability to make personal back ups for mp3 portable devices or CD back ups of legally downloaded content for personal use. So the only people that this new law will effect are those that are breaking the law by selling or sharing illegal copy's of music / DVDs / blurays / software / clothing and so on and also those that are buying it or downloading it are also being targated with this new law.

Score: 2

eqinox187

9:22am on 12/2/2012

.. "This country is DEAD 10:50 PM on 11/2/2012 This is ONLY ABOUT PROFITEERING AND GREED and NOTHING ELSE ...... Are you seriously saying that a company wanting to protect its products from theft and to protect the public from often poor quality unsafe copy's while reclaiming the lost profit is wrong? Or are you saying it is perfectly fine for people to take these products and illegally copy them and put them on the web for free download or for sale in the proses committing theft on a grand scale? You seem to be forgetting how these company's make there music or there DVDs / BluRays or there fancy clothing or computer software...... yes that's right the profits they make from the sale of the product are used to make new products/software or used for research to create new technology. So with out this stolen income they have less resources to invest in developing new products and in the end they have to cut back on man power just to make a profit and still make there products. Where as had a large part of there income not been stolen by thief's they would have not had to lay of staff / they would be able to create better products and still turn a profit. So this has nothing to do with profiteering or greed and is simply the company's trying to provent people stealing there products and yes the proffit they bring this is not greed this is there right after all every shop / company looks to bring a profit even your local asda looks to bring a profit so will that meen its ok to go in there fill up your trolley and then walk out with out paying for the stuff ?

Score: 3
2 replies

paulnaylor

12:32pm on 12/2/2012

thing is this legislation is being brought in disguised as an anti piracy solution, but hides the real truth behind it, this is what a lot of people are objecting to....if it was just about anti piracy then fair enough, fact is it isnt.

Score: 1

eqinox187

4:57am on 13/2/2012

Im not sure what hiden truth your speeking of as i have read over the act fully and i see nothing that would restrict the internet for the normal law following person. This act is only aimed at those that break the laws by shareing content. It amuses me to see people protesting against an act to provent piracy and by doing so they protesters are showing there suport for these criminals that do it. For a full and informed look at the Act see the link and you will see that there is no hidden dark secret . <a href="http://ec.europa.eu/trade/creating-opportunities/trade-topics/intellectual-property/anti-counterfeiting/" rel='nofollow'>http://ec.europa.eu/trade/creating-opportunities/trade-topics/intellectual-property/anti-counterfeiting/</a>

Score: 1

paulnaylor

12:27pm on 12/2/2012

ACTA = Internet police

Name witheld

12:49pm on 13/2/2012

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Score: 2
Advertisement