UK & World News

  • 20 November 2012, 17:27

Sally Bercow Names Teen In New Twitter Row

Sally Bercow has quit Twitter after sparking a new furore by naming a teenage schoolgirl protected by a court order.

Having already embroiled herself in the Lord McAlpine row, the wife of the Commons Speaker named a girl who allegedly ran away with a maths teacher.

Mrs Bercow sent a message to her 59,000 followers on the website on Sunday, asking what had happened to teacher Jeremy Forrest and naming the girl.

Journalists immediately warned her of her mistake and she deleted her tweet hours later, but legal experts said she could be fined for contempt of court.

In the wake of her latest gaffe, she posted late on Monday: "Looking at tweets but (sadly) can't reply (#lawyerswhippedmyass #asdidMrB). So text/email/DM me if you're a mate. Hope 2 b back soon. xx."

But hours later, her Twitter feed was no longer accessible and attempts to reach it directed to a page declaring: "Sorry, that page doesn't exist!"

Some reports suggested she may have taken the step after apparently being hacked.

A derogatory message was published on her page overnight, saying: "Hello 1000s of followers (funking lunatics). Stupid woman - password softearev."

Mr Forrest was arrested in Bordeaux in September after a search by police in Britain and France. He was returned to Britain and has been charged with child abduction.

A court made what is known as a Section 39 Order under the Children and Young Persons Act 1933, which forbids naming the girl involved in the case.

The order states: "Any publication by whatever media in breach of this order is punishable by a fine in the sum of £5,000."

Sussex Police, the investigating force in the Forrest case said: "We will actively investigate potential criminal breaches of these restrictions."

Mrs Bercow is already under intense scrutiny because of her Twitter account after she waded into the speculation sparked by allegations a senior Tory was involved in child sex abuse.

She posted: "Why is Lord McAlpine trending? *innocent face*."

Lord McAlpine was not named in the BBC Newsnight programme that reported the allegations but was identified later in the subsequent social media frenzy.

After a week, his alleged victim confirmed he had made a mistake and the peer reached a £185,000 settlement with the corporation last week.

Mrs Bercow insisted her post about the peer was not libellous but has now received a letter before action from Lord McAlpine's solicitors.

The former Tory's legal team have made clear they are targeting people who named him on Twitter, warning: "We know who you are."

Mrs Bercow wrote on Twitter: "Thanks for phone calls/texts/tweets. I guess I'd better get some legal advice then. Still maintain was not a libellous tweet - just foolish."

Several users of the site did come to her defence after her second gaffe, suggesting that the name of the teenager is already widely known.

"The Section 39 Order is an ass. In a pub quiz, we'd all know the name," tweeted ?@shcomben.

"The whole Sally Bercow debacle is a hit (sic) much - wasn't that girl's name common knowledge at the time?" @HartleyR27 said.

what do you think?

15 comments

krafty81

10:37pm on 19/11/2012

I thought we all knew her name, even though I've forgotten it.

Score: 12
6 replies

Matt Varnam

10:49pm on 19/11/2012

Just about the whole of Europe knows/ knew her name because of the massive man hunt by the police! I would remind you of her name but I can't afford the 5 grand, but it does seem a little silly banning her name after it was plastered all over the papers for a week earlier this year!

Score: 13

stevenrockdj

2:10am on 20/11/2012

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Score: 1

Dave Harrison

10:52am on 20/11/2012

Krafty. True but how many can remember now? Out of sight, out of mind which is I suspect why the court order was made to allow the girl to become anonymous again and get on with her life.

Score: 6

Valerie Wood

11:21am on 20/11/2012

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Valerie Wood

4:19pm on 20/11/2012

ha ha ha Orange has deleted my comment even though I didn't actually mention her name but gave a cryptic clue LOLOLOL

Score: 3

Valerie Wood

4:23pm on 20/11/2012

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Dave Harrison

11:09pm on 19/11/2012

As the wife of the speaker she obviously thinks that rules & court orders apply to the little people and not to her. Time she was dragged before a court for her casual disregard for the law and made to account for her actions.

Score: 17
10 replies

ali baba

11:36am on 20/11/2012

mate being a sunderland fan is taking its toll on you. that oneil will bankrupt you before you know it everyone knows her name anyway:)

Score: 8

Dave Harrison

11:51am on 20/11/2012

Oh Ali. That was below the belt. Do you not think I suffer enough

Score: 4

Jasmin Louise

11:58am on 20/11/2012

Dave, you're not a Slunderland fan are you?? And here's me thinking you had common sense :P

Score: 4

Dave Harrison

12:31pm on 20/11/2012

Fraid so Jasmin. We all have a cross to bear. It is just that most times mine seems so much heavier than others

Score: 3

Jasmin Louise

4:24pm on 20/11/2012

Lol Dave, my Husband's a Whitley Bay lad. He supports The Toon though lol.

Score: 5

krafty81

6:05pm on 20/11/2012

Nufc I'm afraid!

Score: 3

Jasmin Louise

6:16pm on 20/11/2012

I'm. Plymouth Argyle :)

Score: 3

Jasmin Louise

6:20pm on 20/11/2012

Awaiting the thumbs down! Lmao...

Score: 5

Dave Harrison

11:47pm on 20/11/2012

Hells bells, one married to a Whitley Bay lad, another supporting the toon and even Plymouth Argyle get a mention. And I thought I had problems. Deepest sympathy to you all.

Score: 2

Jasmin Louise

11:55am on 21/11/2012

Can't you go off some people eh? Lol

Score: 2

Baker101

12:11am on 20/11/2012

Why on earth can you not name her? It was in the papers every day for a week. You start typing the first name into Google and it's the 2nd suggested search. There's no hiding her identity. And to be quite frank, if she didn't want her name plastered everywhere she shouldn't have ran off with him when it was quite clearly going to cause a media frenzy. Besides, she apparently had in her list of things to achieve that she wanted to trend on twitter one day, so it's not like she was against the idea of her name being widely known on the internet.

Score: 7
1 reply

Dave Harrison

10:54am on 20/11/2012

Baker. Because there is a court order in place saying you can't. This isn't about the girl it is about people who think they are above the law and doing as they please

Score: 6

shaun spencer

7:54am on 20/11/2012

What everybody knows who she was.how daft.this must some stupid mistake.

Score: 4

Gareth Wiseman

9:46am on 20/11/2012

Her name was wideley publicised at the time, therefore people know her name (like the others I have forgotten it already) but the court order was not wideley publicised so any one could have made this mistake. I know ignorance of the law is not an excuse, but door, horse, bolted ??? But it should be good to see the outcome, as many others may have done the same, all oblivious of the court order, and will they come up with a solution as to how could this be avoided in the future, I doubt it.

Score: 6
1 reply

Gareth Wiseman

9:55am on 20/11/2012

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Gordon Wright

9:48am on 20/11/2012

If the law says you cannot name her, then don't name her. There are many laws that people find stupid but we still have to obey them. We cannot pick and choose and it is high time this stupid woman was taught a lesson, preferably an expensive one........

Score: 13
2 replies

Dave Harrison

10:56am on 20/11/2012

Gordon. And so say all of us. Time she was taken down several pegs and had her ego punctured

Score: 10

bjnk

8:18pm on 20/11/2012

If she becomes subject to a fine, will this end up on someones expense account paid out of the public purse.

Score: 4

gengisken1227

10:20am on 20/11/2012

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Score: 1

Lorgar Aurelian

10:34am on 20/11/2012

I still remember the girls name So do millions of others as it was plastered all over the media! How absolutely ridiculous...

Score: 7

Mark Hussey

12:23pm on 20/11/2012

The reson is so the techer gets a fair justice the hope is given time we forget her name and his

Score: 3

t.bulgin

1:13pm on 20/11/2012

What a ridiculous idiot. The wifes no better either.

Score: 11
1 reply

Dave Harrison

1:59pm on 20/11/2012

Cutting tb. cutting, but true

Score: 5

Chris Carr

1:22pm on 20/11/2012

I think the time is coming when all the different bits of law that apply to social media were codified into one statute so that everyone knows where they stand. there are perfectly good laws on libel, racial hatred etc which apply equally in this space as in the "real" wold but people don't seem to realise that.

Score: 3

tyneview33

2:01pm on 20/11/2012

Does she not think before she tweets.

Score: 9
3 replies

Dave Harrison

2:18pm on 20/11/2012

Don't be silly. You need half a brain to do that

Score: 7

krafty81

6:08pm on 20/11/2012

Sorry put thumbs down. How do you reverse to thumbs up?

Score: 2

Dave Harrison

7:11pm on 21/11/2012

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

bobh_385

5:09pm on 20/11/2012

What a bunch of twits that use twitter

Score: 7

Thomas Cat

8:12pm on 20/11/2012

Silly little non-entity.She's now crying 'foul' and 'I was only joking' because she's facing a libel action. Two brain cells:one's escaped and the other's out looking for it.

Score: 6

SagePhotoWorld

5:48am on 21/11/2012

Twitter and Facebook both need to be banned.

Score: 5
Advertisement