UK & World News
Syria: Obama Warns Against Chemical Warfare
Barack Obama has warned Syrian President Bashar Assad of the "consequences" if he were to make the "tragic mistake" of using chemical weapons against his own people.
The US President's remarks came as security officials said they had detected activity at chemical weapons depots.
"I want to make it absolutely clear to Assad and those under his command, the world is watching. The use of chemical weapons is and would be totally unacceptable," he said.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton echoed Mr Obama's caution that such action would cross a "red line" for the United States that would prompt action.
She did not, however, address the reports of movement at Syrian chemical weapons depots - or go into detail about what the response might be - but insisted that Washington would address any threat that arises.
"We have made our views very clear: This is a red line for the United States," she said on Monday while in Prague for meetings with Czech officials.
"I'm not going to telegraph in any specifics what we would do in the event of credible evidence that the Assad regime has resorted to using chemical weapons against their own people. But suffice it to say, we are certainly planning to take action if that eventuality were to occur."
She added: "We once again issue a very strong warning to the Assad regime that their behaviour is reprehensible, their actions against their own people have been tragic.
"But there is no doubt that there's a line between even the horrors that they've already inflicted on the Syrian people and moving to what would be an internationally condemned step of utilising their chemical weapons."
White House, press secretary Jay Carney added: "We are concerned that in an increasingly beleaguered regime, having found its escalation of violence through conventional means inadequate, might be considering the use of chemical weapons against the Syrian people."
The warning came as Lebanese security officials said Syria's Foreign Ministry spokesman had left the country and was heading to the UK on a flight from Beirut.
However, it was unclear whether Jihad Makdissi had defected from Mr Assad's regime.
Syria has been careful never to confirm that it has any chemical weapons - any use of which would draw international condemnation.
Its ministry of foreign affairs said Syria "would not use chemical weapons - if there are any - against its own people under any circumstances".
Syria is believed to have several hundred ballistic surface-to-surface missiles capable of carrying chemical warheads, and there are concerns its chemical and biological weapons could fall into the wrong hands should the regime in Syria collapse and lose control of them.
The US has opposed military intervention or providing arms support to Syria's rebels for fear of further escalating a conflict that activists say has killed more than 40,000 people since March 2011.
Meanwhile, the United Nations said it was suspending its aid operations in Syria and withdrawing all non-essential international staff due to attacks on humanitarian aid convoys and the hijacking of goods or vehicles in recent weeks.
The European Union said it too was scaling back its activities in the Syrian capital Damascus due to the worsening security situation.
Update:
Hello, regular commenting on Orange News and Sport pages closes on Thursday 30 May 2013. We will continue to provide a commenting facility on major news and sport events on orangeworld.co.uk. Contact us via http://oran.ge/OWfeedback if you have any further questions. Thanks.
what do you think?

bjnk
Dave, now listen carefully your buddy Barack is letting you know Syria has weapons of mass destruction,start mobilisation now,you may have to cancel christmas leave.

jimmyjedi1979
The world is watching you Mr snake in the grass obama! Only the sheep fall for these stories. Now start focusing on ending wars not trying to create more.

john
More flim flammery from a gobsmith, is it better to die from being blown apart by "civilised" high explosives or to perish from chemical weapons? the end result is the same. The almighty USA didn't seem to mind the Israelis dropping white phosphorous on a captive civilian population in Gaza, hundreds of babies are still born deformed in Vietnam from the effects of American chemical weapons.

stevie may
There is justification in keeping nuclear weapons - our planet's last line of defence against meteors and comets etc. But I can see no reason for keeping these vile weapons. . Ban chemical weapons now

john
Protection against comets! you have been watching too many bad yank movies Steve.

Gavin Freeborn
there is no justification Steve they are the ultimate bullying tools for the super powers why do you think Iran and Korea want one? so they can no longer get bullied by the west the single most evil and destructive weapon man has ever created and i wish to god they had never been invented

stevie may
Bad Hollywood movies or not - it is a fact that this planet is at threat from 'global killer' asteroids and comets. What about the one that smashed into the Yucatan Peninsular 65 million years ago that wiped out the dinosaurs? Fact. I dont like nuclear weapons but it is true that they are Earth's last line of defence. But not to be sidetracked. . The point I was trying to make is that some weapons have a justification in a nations armoury for matters of defence - that does not include chemical weapons which I think are vile and any nation who would use them deserves international condemnation. That's all

Gavin Freeborn
the only nation in the world which has used weapons of mass destruction on another nation and rains down bombs in Pakistan and Afghanistan with man less drones killing children has the cheek and hypocrisy to tell another nation about ethics, WERE did they get these surface to air missiles from my guess is America obama get your own house in order





stevie may
11:32pm on 3/12/2012
Chemical weapons are vile, as are the monsters who would consider using them. Just like Halabjah. Why are these horrible weapons not banned?
jimmyjedi1979
9:12am on 4/12/2012
Because we make lots of money when we make them, sell them and cause unrest and provocation between other countries.
Gavin Freeborn
10:19am on 4/12/2012
were do you think these chemical weapons come from who makes them they come from us and America