UK & World News
Foreign Office Summons Israel's Ambassador
Israel's ambassador to the UK was summoned to the Foreign Office in a diplomatic protest at the country's settlement building plans.
The Foreign Office said it had made clear to Daniel Taub "the depth of the UK's concerns" about proposals to build 3,000 settler homes in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem.
The move, which would see homes built on the controversial E1 area, could effectively cut off Palestinians in East Jerusalem from the rest of the West Bank, ending hopes for a Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital.
The US State Department was also critical of Israel's actions, saying that it "opposes all unilateral actions".
"This includes building in the E-1 area as this area is particularly sensitive and construction there would be especially damaging to efforts to achieve a two-state solution," said deputy spokesman Mark Toner.
"We have made clear to the Israeli government that such action is contrary to US policy."
Despite the diplomatic action, Israel looks set to resist international pressure, according to a source in the Israeli Prime Minister's office.
The source told the AFP news agency: "Israel continues to insist on its vital interests, even under international pressure. There will be no change in the decision that has been made."
The head of the United Nations, Ban Ki-moon, has warned that the Israeli decision to approve plans for settlement building was an "almost fatal blow" for peace hopes.
Both the Foreign Secretary, William Hague, and the US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, have condemned the plan as "illegal" and said it casts doubts on Israel's commitment to peace.
Speaking after meeting Mr Taub, Alistair Burt, the Minister for the Middle East, said he had called on Israel to reverse its decision on settlement building.
He said: "I also made clear that the strength of our reaction stems from our disappointment that the Israeli government has not heeded the calls that we and others had made for Israel to avoid reacting to the UN General Assembly resolution in a way that undermines the Palestinian Authority or a return to talks."
France also summoned the Israeli Ambassador to Paris to the French foreign ministry.
David Cameron said the UK government was "not proposing to do anything further at this stage".
He said: "We are continuing to have conversations with the Israeli government and others. We are consulting with international partners and discussing the situation with the Israeli government."
Sam Kiley, Sky News' Middle East Correspondent, said: "What they are saying to Israel is that we are very angry about this, we are sincere we don't want to see any of these settlements continue to expand because, as Ban Ki-moon said yesterday, it will be a fatal blow to the peace process."
The E1 area of East Jerusalem is a 4.6 square mile area, which is largely uninhabited. Israel has been under pressure from the international community, especially the US, not to build homes there.
This is because any settlement will effectively cut the West Bank in two and prevent a contiguous Palestinian state.
Israel has built 100 settlements since its occupation of East Jerusalem and the West Bank - development that is considered illegal under international law.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu approved the settlement proposal just 24 hours after the UN agreed to officially recognise a Palestinian state, entitling the Palestinians to take part in UN debates.
The decision was opposed by the US and Britain abstained from the vote, with Mr Hague saying he could only back the move if the Palestinians agreed to return to peace talks immediately.
Mr Netanyahu has also announced a freeze on the tax revenue that the Israelis collect then pass back to the Palestinians.
Matthew Gould was appointed as Britain's first Jewish Ambassador to Israel in September 2010.
On taking up the post he said: "We come out determined to help build the strongest possible partnership between Britain and Israel, and to help ensure that Britain and Europe do everything they can to help the people of Israel move forward on the difficult path towards peace and lasting security."
Update:
Hello, regular commenting on Orange News and Sport pages closes on Thursday 30 May 2013. We will continue to provide a commenting facility on major news and sport events on orangeworld.co.uk. Contact us via http://oran.ge/OWfeedback if you have any further questions. Thanks.
what do you think?

d and d Phillips
Well said Stevie

Viv hanshall
What would it achieve? It may mean that Israel will start to comply with international law and stop the settlement building. If Palestine is prevented from gaining independence as Israel seems determined that it must, then the millions of Palestinians living under occupation will effectively be living under a different law than Israelis. That is apartheid. This will not benefit the Israelis - quite apart from the injustice it perpetrates on the Palestinians.

Russell6730
This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Viv hanshall
Russell - the overwhelming majority of the World Community voted for a two state solution. This has nothing to do with ''Muslims in this county''. The UN voted for an independent Palestine alongside Israel. Israel is defying this vote by proposing further settlement building in Palestine. Remember these settlements are for Jews only - not for Palestinian Christians, Palestinian Muslims or Palestinians full stop.

Steve V
Why has Jordan never been held to account for expelling the Palestinians in the first place? Shows how biased and zionophobic the UN is. Im appalled a UK government is swallowing the UN line on this one.

blue side
It has to be said that Israel came into existence through terrorism supported by the strong US Jewish lobby. To me I continually see them pushing the boundaries and have heard some disturbing stories of Israeli military abuse in both the Lebanon and Palestine (hearsay no evidence) but for obvious reasons as a Westerner our views are tainted by the present events in the Middle East and Islamic terrorist activities. I doubt whether having representation in Israel will make any difference as the US supports everything they do though by not being there we are not condoning the atrocities they commit against the Arabs.

fish41
Not just hearsay- their is a website run by former IDF soldiers who are blowing the whistle on some of the sytematic ill treatment and "physchological terrorism" they were carrying out on Palestinians.

Viv hanshall
fish41 is correct. Look up Breaking the Silence. Also look up B'tslem another Israeli group that monitors the abuses committed by the Israeli occupation.

blue side
Thanks guys but one report I had caused me to make complaint to Amnesty International something I have never done before. Though of course ethnic cleansing was carried out by the Israelis back in the 40s. On this subject I feel sorry for the Palestinians

jimmyjedi1979
Also see the many journalists that sold themselves to the zionist bbc- and once they realised what they did, by witnessing the sheer destruction, terror and murder they helped justify, are now haunted and psychologically disturbed by their immoral reporting. All the evidence and accounts for all our zionist lead agendas are all on the internet. Just requires you to do some reading, watching. None of which is being broadcast on Murdoch news. And now the herd and non psychotic people are waking up they are pushing for state controlled media and bloggers to be punished for speaking against government or Israel. Levason is there to take away our privileges of free speech and all you clowns that support Israel are in fact fighting against yourselves. Wake up now!

stevie may
If Israel permanently stopped pre-emptive strikes, stopped their building projects permanently - would that stop the Iranian supplied rocket attacks on Israel ? No. That's because Hezbollah, Hamas, Al Queda and the Taliban want an international caliphate, enforced on a global scale upon the 'kuffire' (non-believer). The rules of which are complience or death. The vast majority of the 1.6 billion muslims dont want this. The caliphate is a military theocratic system based on the structure of the Ottoman Empire. It calls for the obliteration of Israel and the enforcement of a twisted form of 6th Century Sharia Law upon the whole planet. Compliance or death. How is any nation state, or democratic people supposed to negotiate with people like that? Its like trying to negotiate with white supremacists of american fundamentalist christians. . . Impossible. So how can Israel negotiate with people who have sworn to kill every jewish child? How would the UK react if we were in Israel's position?

Viv hanshall
Stevie - there are no rocket attacks from The West Bank. The moderates in the West Bank do not commit regular acts of violence against Israel (if you look up the statistics of killings, abductions, incursions, house demolitions they are all from Israel against the occupied Palestinians.) The Palestinians are not calling for a caliphate. Hamas are more belligerent than Fatah which is exactly one reason to support the democratic and legitimate aspirations of the moderate Palestinians.

Russell6730
Why must Britain always take sides with muslims? is it because there are 2 million of them living here and are fearful of repercussions if we keep our noses out. They've got this Gov.by the you know what.

Viv hanshall
138 countries voted for a two state solution. This has nothing to do with Muslims - the support for a free Palestine is not a community issue as people from all religions, all backgrounds, all political views support an end to the occupation.

fish41
Britain doesnt always take sides with Muslims on the contrary Britain (like the US) has a lot of vested interests in Israel and vice versa. I see Brits killing muslims when its in our interest

GillieLouise
You need to get your facts correct and undstand this topic before commenting Russell

jimmyjedi1979
Russell is not the sharpest of tools folks.

Viv hanshall
The vote in the UN was unanimous and overwhelming in its support for Palestine and Israel to be two states based on roughly the 1967 borders. The Palestinians have accepted this. Israel, by its actions, will not - despite always saying it is the one that wants peace. This current threat by Israel - including the confiscation of Palestinian tax (which is Palestinian money) is cynical, self obsessed and self destructive. It is time to move forward and to work towards a just solution. The world has voted in favour. Israel should comply with world opinion as to isolate itself further is counterproductive. What would further isolation, boycott, condemnation achieve?

fish41
Whilst i disagree with Israels actions in this case I have more fears about your statement "The World has voted in favour" I dont like the idea of a New one world order

Viv hanshall
It's not a ''one world order'' it's democracy. The countries of the world were asked to vote on a resolution and that was the vote - 139 for, 9 against. It's exactly the same as any other voting process

shaun spencer
Here here viv.

jimmyjedi1979
Viv you have wise words to say about the zionists, but fish is absolutely correct. International law is centralization of power. We gave our power away to unelected people in Brussels, and they are now giving it up to international law. Eventually we will be governed by a tiny amount of people that control everything. the UN is a farce, as is nato, next they will have world banks which will be ran by world government and protected by the world army UN, and

Viv hanshall
If you want to read some facts about the occupation and the devastating effect it has on Palestinians there are several Israeli organizations which monitor the occupation. They also provide information on Palestinian casualties, house demolitions, land confiscation, abduction of children by the Israeli army and much more. Look up B'tslem, Gisha, Breaking the Silence, Gush Shalom.

shaun spencer
Very glad the uk is taking the iniative here hope others follow suit.whats the un doing about the settlements .nothing.this has been going on since the 60s. When the un made a resolution that israel made no settlments in the occupied teritories.their just like a dog biting that has no teeth.get out israel now..otherwise we will sanction you.and withdraw our embasses.as we would have done to other agressors

shaun spencer
Ie iraq kuwait.

GillieLouise
Well said
Name witheld
This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

stevie may
Ever thought about having the courage to make comments under your own name and not hide behind a tagname? Ever wondered why nobody else responds to your comments?

jimmyjedi1979
Steve and the zionists kissing in a tree k-i-s-s-i-n-g you have to laugh at the walking dead lol

stevie may
Jimmy - its stevie not steve. . Just add an extra vowel. Wonder if you'd still support Islamic fundamentalism if someone you knew was murdered by a suicide bomber?

jimmyjedi1979
Steve, i wonder if you'd still support the zionists if you knew one of the millions upon millions of people that have been and are still being murdered on a minutely basis. In comparison to the odd suicide bomber i think the zionists might just miss out on the moral high ground. Zombie.

GillieLouise
Isreal at its very best again!!!!!! Shame on them. Its about time we made a stance.

happymike CHESTER
What`s up.The British Government showing some bottle against Israel`s right-wing Government ,the Friends Of Israel will be upset .Getting America to stop supplying them arms would be a big help.

peter brady
There is a growing lobby in the US to do just that - stop the continual flow of weapons to Israel. Recently many church leaders wrote to Obama highlighting their concerns.

jimmyjedi1979
As if in a million years Britain will do any such thing! This is a silly attempt at trying to appease the millions of us intelligent beings that know how immoral and evil the zionists agenda is. Viva palestina!

Windows Live User
Tea & a biscuit with the words "I say chaps, this really is not good enough". Thats the way. That will really make them rethink their strategy.

peter brady
Windows live user - I am afraid you may be correct. It's up to us to pressure our government. Write to your MP (they can be found on TheyworkforUs) Write to the Israeli embassy in London expressing your concern. If Premiership footballers can get together to protest against Israel then so can we.

peter brady
A statement signed by 62 players, including Chelsea's Hazard and Arsenal's Diaby, claims that Israel hosting the tournament will be 'seen as a reward for actions that are contrary to sporting values.' The players, among them a number of top players from the English, French, Italian and Spanish top flight, said they expressed solidarity with Gazans who were "living under siege and denied basic human dignity and freedom". "The latest Israeli bombardment of Gaza, resulting in the death of over a hundred civilians, was yet another stain on the world's conscience," they added in the letter, which was widely published on the Internet. The players also highlighted the Israeli bombardment of a football stadium in Gaza on November 10 that killed four teenagers and the plight of a number of Palestinian footballers detained - without charge - by Israel since February this year.






stevie may
8:57am on 3/12/2012
Dont see what that would achieve. . . Besides, how can we withdraw our ambassador from Israel and still leave one in Iran? All seems a bit contrary to me
ali baba
9:05am on 3/12/2012
Huge difference Mr may.
stevie may
9:12am on 3/12/2012
Do Israelis have designs to launch terrorist attacks on those who refuse to accept an international caliphate. No.
d and d Phillips
9:43am on 3/12/2012
Well said Stevie May
Name witheld
12:02pm on 3/12/2012
This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.
stevie may
1:53pm on 3/12/2012
This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.
jimmyjedi1979
2:00pm on 3/12/2012
Stevie mays real name is tony Blair
stevie may
2:05pm on 3/12/2012
No I dont hide behind a tagname like you. I'm happy to have the courage of my convictions. . Why cant you or Christos?