UK & World News

  • 5 October 2012, 10:56

UN Security Council Condemns Strike On Turkey

The UN Security Council has condemned "in the strongest terms" Syria's shelling of a Turkish town, which killed five women and children.

A council press statement late on Thursday said: "This incident highlighted the grave impact the crisis in Syria has on the security of its neighbours and on regional peace and stability."

The council demanded an immediate end to such violations of international law and called on the Syrian government "to fully respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of its neighbours".

The Security Council, which has been deeply divided over Syria, managed to bridge differences between the US and its Western allies who were demanding a strong text and Syria's most important ally Russia, which tried to weaken the text.

The statement came after Syria's mortar strike on the Turkish town of Akcakale killed five civilians and wounded at least 10 others.

Turkey returned fire, and its parliament voted to authorise military operations inside Syria. However, the country's Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said the pounding of Syrian targets was just "a warning".

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon has urged both countries to exercise "maximum restraint".

His spokesman Martin Nesirky said: "The secretary general calls on all concerned to abandon the use of violence, exercise maximum restraint and exert all efforts to move toward a political solution.

"As the situation inside Syria deteriorates yet further ... the risks of regional conflict and the threat to international peace and security are also increasing."

British Foreign Secretary William Hague said the shelling was "completely unacceptable, not only for Turkey but for the international community as a whole".

what do you think?

7 comments

Adj Jackson

5:46am on 5/10/2012

Bet the people of Turkey will sleep easier knowing that the UN gas condemed the attack

Score: 7

Russell Beaumont

6:24am on 5/10/2012

It will make no difference as to who fired the opening shots when the middle east is engulfed in war.

Score: 4

Christopher Hodson

9:07am on 5/10/2012

here we go, they have said sorry for the incident so it is not suprisinng that the UN have made coments and yes the British Forrign Secretary yet again has stuck his comments in. Why this mupet jumps on every band wagon in the worlld and spends money we do not have is obvious. It is for him to get a foot hold into world affairs for personal gain after the next election. Sort our home issues first if you are British and not others

Score: 3
1 reply

Mick Salt

11:43am on 5/10/2012

I'm not sure I quite understand your indignation, Christopher. After all, William Hague IS the foreign secretary and I would expect him to have something to say about major international events. I would imagine that his comments didn't cost us too much either. We have a host of ministers responsible for our domestic affairs. Best to let them sort out our home issues.

Score: 3

Windows Live User

9:14am on 5/10/2012

Why can't British Foreign Secretary William Hague just keep his mouth closed instead of trying to follow when someone else has lead? Like anyone listens to him!

Score: 6

Howard Kingsbury

10:50am on 5/10/2012

In the Korean War, it was said that an Englishman was worth 2 Yanks & aTurk was worth 2 Englishmen. So I eagerly await the outcome of Assad's latest fit of insanity.

Score: 3

Mark Hussey

2:04pm on 5/10/2012

Uk and turkey are both NATO members that is why we are showing a interest in wot is hapening to another nato member

Score: 2

Name witheld

2:29pm on 5/10/2012

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Advertisement