UK & World News
'US Can Learn From Australia's Gun Laws'
When Martin Bryant massacred 35 people with semi-automatic weapons at a tourist spot in Tasmania in 1996, then-Australian prime minister John Howard reacted swiftly by pushing for tough new national gun laws.
Just 12 days after the shootings at Port Arthur, legislation was agreed which banned most people from owning rapid fire rifles and shotguns.
In a government buyback scheme more than 600,000 weapons were handed in and destroyed.
There have been no mass killings since.
Neil Noye was the local Mayor at the time. Speaking to Channel 9 about the recent US killings he said: "It's devastating and my thoughts and prayers go out to those families because I know exactly what they are going through.
"John Howard brought the gun laws in. Some people hated him and some people loved him, but I think that was a good thing."
Now US President Barack Obama is facing the same dilemma after the Newtown school massacre in Connecticut that killed 20 children and six adults.
While the gun lobby is far more powerful in the US and gun ownership culturally embedded through the constitution, the conservative Mr Howard says now is the time to tackle the politically sensitive issue.
"It will be difficult but it can be done," Mr Howard, who had only been in the job two months when the Port Arthur killings happened, told Sydney's Daily Telegraph.
Speaking earlier this year after another US gun massacre, Mr Howard noted: "If I hadn't done something I would have been squandering the moral authority I had as a newly-elected prime minister."
Australian MP Andrew Leigh has studied and written about the effects of the legislation.
"One in three American households has a gun, and that has terrible consequences when a teenager gets depressed or a family dispute gets out of control," he said.
"There are Australians who wouldn't be walking the streets if it wasn't for the gun buyback. It saved about 200 lives a year it continues to make Australia a safer place today."
The politician believes America can learn a great deal from the Australian experience and says the US "can recognise that you can have both - you can have that culture of sport shooting that Americans prize so dearly but without the tragic gun violence that plagues so many American lives every year".
In 2009 in Australia there were 0.1 gun murders per 100,000 people compared to 3.2 per 100,000 in the US, according to the most recent data from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
Philip Alpers, an analyst on gun violence at the University of Sydney who worked on weapons control in the US for four years, admits drawing parallels between Australia and US is difficult.
"Culturally we are very different. The automatic Australian reaction after Port Arthur was that we need to pull back on gun ownership - fewer guns are better. Howard had a groundswell of public support on his side," he said.
"In the US, reaction over the past few years has increasingly been, more guns make us safer. Guns are confused with freedom and opinion is so polarised that it might be impossible for Obama to do anything."
Not everyone in Australia has been convinced by the legislation.
Colourful independent MP in rural Queensland, Bob Katter, said: "You can ban all the guns in the world but those sort of people find some other way of doing it.
"You create a morbid fascination when you ban them and I think that has a lot to do with some of these terrible incidents that are occurring."
The Sporting Shooters Association of Australia, which lobbied against the Howard laws, says gun death rates were falling anyway.
It points to an independent report by the Melbourne Institute in 2008 which contradicts claims that fewer guns mean fewer homicides and suicides.
"There is little evidence to suggest that it had any significant effects on firearm homicides and suicides," the Melbourne study concluded, referring to the National Firearms Agreement.
Australia still has gun crime of course, especially amongst Sydney's biker gangs, but since Port Arthur no Australian shooting has made global headlines.
Unlike in America guns aren't entwined in Australia's culture, but changing gun laws was still a brave move, as politicians in Washington know all too well.
Hello, regular commenting on Orange News and Sport pages closes on Thursday 30 May 2013. We will continue to provide a commenting facility on major news and sport events on orangeworld.co.uk. Contact us via http://oran.ge/OWfeedback if you have any further questions. Thanks.
what do you think?
USA must change gun laws
I noticed in yesterdays news that a lawsuit has been against sandy hook school.what good will this do nothing besides the parents getting money for a childs life.im afraid if they sucseed what will the schools have to do, hire an armed guard or arm the school caretakers.at the end of the day common sence must prevail the americans need to stop bleating on about the centurys old 2 nd amendment.the rest of the civilized world can see what needs to be done except the americans themselves or should i say the minority gun lobby.
It WOULD HELP if thay sorted out proper mental health care plus had a database of all suffers to stop them geting guns(2)there is no chance of a ban as it would be lnposable to enforce it as lawyers would have a field day over civil rights and 2nd amd
I disagree mark.checking the populations mental health will help to a certain extent but peaple have sudden mental breakdowns.okay it will take decades to withdraw guns but youve got to make a start somewhere and not be dictated to by the gun lobbyists.
I was very much struck by a scene in the classic film shane yesterday.where theres a scene where the hero shane decides to teach the familys young lad to shoot.the mother of the lad sees this and tells shane" i dont want to bring my boy up to know about guns and be like you".shane replys" a gun is like a shovel or a pickaxe and is just another tool and it depends on the man behind it".in which the woman replys " if there wasnt any guns within a 100 miles of here we wouldnt have found ourselves in this position in the first place" anyway an old classic film and i found the scene very apt to the american situation now.
The USA will not learn from Australia as long as American politicians receive fun ding from the NRA. Self-interest comes first in America, and until that changes, nothing else stands a bat's chance of changing.