Quirky News

  • 8 February 2012, 12:51

Police officer chased himself

CCTV /PA

An undercover policeman "chased" himself for more than 20 minutes after a CCTV operator mistook him for a suspect.

The rookie policeman was patrolling a burglary-hit area when the operator radioed to say he'd seen someone acting suspiciously.

He directed the officer, who works for Sussex Police, as he followed the "suspect" on camera - assuring the pursuing officer he was "hot on his heels".

The "chase" continued until a sergeant entered the CCTV control room and pointed out the operator's mistake.

The blunder, which happened last month, was revealed in Police Federation magazine Police this week after a senior officer relayed the story to the mag.

He said: "The operator had the suspect on camera and everywhere he saw him the keen PC was on his heels.

"Then the sergeant pointed out that the CCTV operator was unaware he was a plain-clothed police officer - thus the PC had been chasing himself."

Sussex Police said they were aware of the incident and "had a laugh" about it, but could give no further details.

 

what do you think?

12 comments

Name witheld

2:22pm on 8/2/2012

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Score: 1
1 reply

Gordon Wright

7:20pm on 8/2/2012

Why don't you give it a try them mate ???

Score: 1

eastonandrea

3:05pm on 8/2/2012

You Gotta Laugh!!!!

andy may

5:38pm on 8/2/2012

makes you proud of sussex police doesn't it?

Score: 1

Arthur Hancock

5:41pm on 8/2/2012

Surely the description given by the PSS licensed CCTV operator to the plod would have alerted the plod that it was himself he was trailing? Or has the CCTV operative not done a recognised PSS course> I can recommend TAVCOM if he has not!!

Score: 2

Davefly Theuniuonflagbrown

6:02pm on 8/2/2012

Put it on Youtube, I loved the Keystone Cops as a kid!

dean bristow

6:06pm on 8/2/2012

oh well who let the dogs out !!!!!

Stephanie Thraves

6:07pm on 8/2/2012

THATS WHAT YOU PAY YOUR COUNCIL TAX FOUR

Score: 2

Ronald Arthur Dewhirst

6:24pm on 8/2/2012

Relax peoples, everyone makes mistakes, you just need to look at the comments people make on these pages. For instance - Stephanie, I don't know how to say this but 'four' should have been spelt 'for'.

Score: 2

Tracey Walker

7:39pm on 8/2/2012

What people need to know is that the `senior` officer who relayed the story hasnt been in the real world for so long that he wouldnt understand the frustration of the rookie and almost certainly is just an officer in charge of his desk and slippers

Score: 1

Rhys Sage

11:41pm on 8/2/2012

Are you sure this wasn't Swansea police?

Score: 1
1 reply

Name witheld

1:30am on 10/2/2012

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Score: 1

Name witheld

1:23am on 9/2/2012

This comment has been removed for violations of our Terms and Conditions.

Score: 1

jones.emyr

7:29pm on 12/2/2012

Very amusing! And yes, Ronald; it is very frustrating in here!

Advertisement