sport

No assurances over SPL TV deal

SPL chief executive Neil Doncaster has offered no assurances that the competition would have a television deal next season without Rangers.

The SPL invited Dundee to replace Rangers in the top flight following their annual general meeting on Monday, where no moves were made towards revisiting their decision to reject the Ibrox club or forcing an SPL2 breakaway.

Scottish Football League clubs were warned that the SPL could lose ££15.7million - all but £1million from broadcasters - were Rangers to be relaunched in the Third Division but Doncaster refused to make any predictions today.

Sky and ESPN were due to sign a new £80million five-year deal this summer but their existing £13million annual contract still has a year to run.

However, most of the SPL's commercial deals have an exit or re-negotiation clause should one of the Old Firm be absent.

Doncaster said: "In terms of financial consequences, we'll work through that over the coming days and weeks with our partners and as soon as we're in a position to make an announcement about the reality then we will do so.

"I'm not going to be commenting specifically on any discussions with any of our partners.

"It's important that we work intensively over the next few days and weeks to bring clarity for the benefit of our clubs and we'll do that as soon as we can."

When asked specifically if there could be no TV deal, Doncaster said: "I'm not going to be speculating on what might be the case.

"I think it's important that we focus on what the reality is and we'll be working to discover what the commercial damage is."

ESPN said after the SFL vote on Friday that they wanted to continue their relationship with Scottish football but Sky Sports have made no comment.

Stenhousemuir produced a detailed report of their briefing by Doncaster and SFA chief executive Stewart Regan which stated that the SPL broadcasting rights were valued at £3million if the new Rangers kicked off life in the Third rather than the First Division.

But Doncaster said: "That document was put together by the SFL not the SPL or the SFA."

Some SFL clubs felt that an SPL2 breakaway was inevitable should they reject the First Division plan but Doncaster said: "Certainly that is not something I have said to anyone, either to the clubs or the media.

"SPL2 wasn't on the agenda today. All of our clubs were focusing on the reality of Rangers being in Division Three and Dundee being invited to take their place."

Regan had vowed to block attempts to put the Ibrox club in the Third Division but Doncaster says he is unaware of any intervention plans, although Charles Green's Sevco Scotland have still to acquire the transfer of Rangers' SFA membership.

"It's probably a question for Stewart rather than me," Doncaster said.

"Our clubs talked about the position following Friday's vote and they were quite clear that they would do what they can to facilitate the decision taken by SFL clubs."

Doncaster rejected claims from some SFL clubs that they had been "bullied" and "threatened" into accepting the First Division plan, which 25 of them rejected.

"I don't think that's fair at all," Doncaster said.

"What we've tried to do is set out the facts as we see them. Certainly I've done that. Stewart Regan has done that.

"I think Stewart Regan has taken a lot of very unfair criticism over recent days. The guy has just been trying to do his utmost for the game in Scotland.

"I think the sort of personal attacks he has had really don't do any credit to those that are making them."

Criticism of Regan intensified at the weekend with a leaked email laying bare his central role in the plan to put newco Rangers in the First Division.

But Doncaster said: "Decisions can only be made by the clubs, decisions can't be taken by executive bodies.

"What we can do is advise, assist and try to bring solutions to the table.

"Ultimately it's for the clubs to decide whether they wish to endorse the actions or not.

"There was a lot of work carried out on behalf of all 42 clubs by the two leagues and the SFA to achieve the best outcome for the game as whole.

"The clubs have made their views felt, that's clear and we have to draw a line under the issue and move forward."

When asked whether he would consider his own position, Doncaster said: "That's really for the 12 clubs who I represent to take a view on, not for me."

Doncaster vowed to continue dialogue with the SFL and SFA over reconstruction proposals but confirmed there would be no promotion play-offs for the top flight in the coming season.

And he said the £2million settlement payment to the SFL might not be paid in full.

"It's not a fixed figure, it's calculated based on the rate of inflation and the SPL's commercial revenues," he said.

"As soon as we're in a position to establish what they are, then that will determine what the payment is this season."

Update:

Hello, regular commenting on Orange News and Sport pages closes on Thursday 30 May 2013. We will continue to provide a commenting facility on major news and sport events on orangeworld.co.uk. Contact us via http://oran.ge/OWfeedback if you have any further questions. Thanks.

what do you think?

4 comments

Grant Baines

8:29am on 17/7/2012

Rangers should cut their loses and walk out on the Scottish league system. It took afc wimbledon about 6 years to reach the football league so it's not that big a distance from local leagues to the premiership if they're good enough

DARREN WRIGHT

10:18am on 17/7/2012

I'll say it again un again RIP scottish footie!!! RTID WRTP STB

Mark Ames

1:28pm on 17/7/2012

Haha lets see all the pathetic sanctamonious provincial nobodys implode & remember when they do that they have done so by the hands of there own supporters who are so bigoted towards rfc that they chose to destroy there own clubs just to stick the knife in.As for the minnows in div 3 rubbing there hands @ the prospect of making money from our demise i say to all rfc supporters do not put a penny in to any club in the country remember that all but 5 of 42 clubs in this country chose to consign the institution that is glasgow rangers to the wasteland that is div 3 so boycott the lot of them & within 1 year there sporting integrity will be out the window & i guarentee there will be league reconstruction.RTID

james

8:29am on 18/7/2012

What was the thought process behind the invitation to Dundee to join the SPL? Should Dunfermline not have stayed in the SPL? Smacks of underhand workings methinks! The SFA and SPL have behaved in a disgraceful manner throughout this whole saga. What exactly have Rangers been proven to have done illegally in this, taking part in a tax avoidance scheme?? I don't know but the whole thing smells!!